[Autoconf] Licensing scheme for draft-ietf-autoconf-adhoc-addr-model-02.txt

Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com> Wed, 17 February 2010 14:50 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E79C3A7ED1 for <autoconf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 06:50:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.224
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.224 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.025, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gLfvcigymonH for <autoconf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 06:50:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from oxalide-out.extra.cea.fr (oxalide-out.extra.cea.fr [132.168.224.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21CB53A7D12 for <autoconf@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 06:49:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by oxalide.extra.cea.fr (8.14.2/8.14.2/CEAnet-Internet-out-2.0) with ESMTP id o1HEpbx1027239 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for <autoconf@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 15:51:37 +0100
Received: from muguet1.intra.cea.fr (muguet1.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.6]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id o1HEpbaP017729 for <autoconf@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 15:51:37 +0100 (envelope-from alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([132.166.133.173]) by muguet1.intra.cea.fr (8.13.8/8.13.8/CEAnet-Intranet-out-1.1) with ESMTP id o1HEpbPQ010009 for <autoconf@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 15:51:37 +0100
Message-ID: <4B7C0279.2030904@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 15:51:37 +0100
From: Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; fr; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100111 Thunderbird/3.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: autoconf@ietf.org
References: <6565C346-EBE5-425A-9291-BBCA4A9FCE27@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <6565C346-EBE5-425A-9291-BBCA4A9FCE27@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: [Autoconf] Licensing scheme for draft-ietf-autoconf-adhoc-addr-model-02.txt
X-BeenThere: autoconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ad-Hoc Network Autoconfiguration WG discussion list <autoconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf>, <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/autoconf>
List-Post: <mailto:autoconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf>, <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 14:50:01 -0000

HEllo AUTOCONFers,

About a non-technical matter of draft-ietf-autoconf-adhoc-addr-model.

Its boilerplate currently says "Code Components extracted from this
document must include Simplified BSD License...".

I disagree with it for three reasons.  First and foremost I do not want
Code Components extracted from this document to include that license,
but another one.  E.g. if linux kernel implements it then GPL is more
suitable.  Second, if there are no Code Components then it would be
useless to talk about Code Components.

Also I disagree with it because the implementation experience which has
been shared on this list often has been about linux, and which is often
GPL and rarely BSD license.

I also have to say I understand fully that the boilerplate is there from
the IETF Trust to which I am bound to abide, by the fact that I am
subscribed to this list.

Respectfully,

Alex
(this is about a series of I-Ds I am following in several WGs)

Le 16/02/2010 20:59, Ryuji Wakikawa a écrit :
> Dear All,
>
> We have concluded the WGLC of
> draft-ietf-autoconf-adhoc-addr-model-01.txt on Dec/23/09, and have a
>  -02 document issued, following up on this.
>
> Thanks to all for all the reviews and comments to this document!
>
> After Thomas and I (Chairs) carefully reviewed discussions on the
> mailing list, we do find that there is rough consensus for the
> current document.
>
> There was an individual objection to the description of the use of
> link-local address, but we did not detect wide support within the
> working group. This objection will, of course, be reflected in the
> PROTO write-up that will be sent to the IESG and the ADs, and
> reflected in the tracker.
>
> As a conclusion, we have established rough consensus to the new
> document.
>
> The WG chairs will start preparing the PROTO writeup for forwarding
> the document.
>
> Thanks,
>
> WG chairs
>
> _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing
> list Autoconf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
>