Re: [Autoconf] Call for comments to a new AUTOCONF charter proposal.

[Emmanuel Baccelli <[e-mail]>]

On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Dearlove, Christopher (UK) <
[e-mail]> wrote:

> Charles Perkins
> > I'd be happy if it were possible for [autoconf] to
> > be allowed to consider the excellent body of work that
> > was seen already years ago -- the same body of work
> > that motivated me and others to create and spend a lot
> > of time over the last years and years.
>
> If Charlie can find a few like-minded people to work on
> that, why not add this as a parallel activity? The
> rationale of why two cases should be straightforward to
> make, they are almost chalk and cheese in e.g. centralised
> versus non-centralised. This is actually added safety to
> the group producing something, as if one succeeds and the
> other fails, that's still good.
>


I also think this parallel approach could be appropriate too.



>
> Unfortunately, I can't offer to be one of those people.
> Although I should be able to contribute at the read and
> comment level, more than that is needed. I only didn't
> make the suggestion earlier as it needs people (with
> all due respect to Charlie, plural) to do the work.
>
>

I'd be happy to help out on the matter. So I guess we have a plural +
contributors ;)

cheers,

Emmanuel