Re: [Autoconf] New Charter- security issues??
reshmi r <reshmi.engg@gmail.com> Fri, 20 August 2010 04:23 UTC
Return-Path: <reshmi.engg@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A7493A69D4 for <autoconf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 21:23:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9eeub+y+xN4y for <autoconf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 21:23:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ww0-f44.google.com (mail-ww0-f44.google.com [74.125.82.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF9A83A67F8 for <autoconf@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 21:23:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wwi17 with SMTP id 17so2841007wwi.13 for <autoconf@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 21:23:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=h5R69zgtLNgskal4S9BDWAwB4mQysqKzIBvo7sLmLHs=; b=Zy0vSz9051jrmkVk9DVRzXaXEYJPPAHgqJLe5bJhIQUI0fLzZxmc2jp6CURNDAs1EH c6mKA/gPkkrhOrlocFwCVeUSVoSsPC7uUiytbIBc1lkVgeaaR5vR6mcDLo4sh2FdZ6Ta Y9JblcEMpH5TZ1m4ZfnpciR/p6wlrZDV9ZGys=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=NAgQ2+KAzkkeEqon5YpS7hEU/qpq6XFlgu5KzBbmNFbpQhAFNlGHIMvreVXrbb1fnL IKavpjZgkCWJGto1lxt7EoUjMdDoUdCl8iFsNLvUEXDReD4uGMrODeqxkGgcM8JeIk0k KY2nu+ji9k8C/Wt4iQ7dP2d3IFf74duWHY204=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.227.141.84 with SMTP id l20mr657204wbu.119.1282278218768; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 21:23:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.227.40.210 with HTTP; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 21:23:38 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 09:53:38 +0530
Message-ID: <AANLkTik-b6pR-H=3C=7g3tfarfKEva99Tc5nb3o+CXEU@mail.gmail.com>
From: reshmi r <reshmi.engg@gmail.com>
To: autoconf@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Subject: Re: [Autoconf] New Charter- security issues??
X-BeenThere: autoconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ad-Hoc Network Autoconfiguration WG discussion list <autoconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf>, <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/autoconf>
List-Post: <mailto:autoconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf>, <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 04:23:07 -0000
Hi, Is it possible to know the various security issues suggested??? Do we mean to start addressing it from router at first and then to addressing methods and then to the protocols??? is this the right order??? any suggestion... Regards, Reshmi. following the mail............. Hi, Is it possible to take a look at the list of items suggested in the new (and supposedly still under debate) charter? In an email sent on Jult 19th, Ruyji mentioned the following list of "opinions": - Centralized and/or De-centerized - Existing protocols (DHCP and/or ND) vs. new autoconf protocols - SIngle or Multiple AUTOCONF protocol(s) - Security issue - Informational link characteristics document