Re: [Autoconf] updated draft on aspects of multi-hop wireless communication
Thomas Heide Clausen <ietf@thomasclausen.org> Wed, 25 February 2009 22:33 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf@thomasclausen.org>
X-Original-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 140C23A6B69 for <autoconf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 14:33:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BmWP0Dz2Qp6z for <autoconf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 14:33:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mho-02-bos.mailhop.org (mho-02-bos.mailhop.org [63.208.196.179]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3421A3A6B1B for <autoconf@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 14:33:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aste-genev-bois-153-1-76-71.w86-203.abo.wanadoo.fr ([86.203.162.71] helo=[192.168.147.109]) by mho-02-bos.mailhop.org with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from <ietf@thomasclausen.org>) id 1LcSJy-000D7B-4D; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 22:33:42 +0000
X-Mail-Handler: MailHop Outbound by DynDNS
X-Originating-IP: 86.203.162.71
X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@dyndns.com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/mailhop/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information)
X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX19ASiI5assRgqDrFkL/4mbM
In-Reply-To: <49A56C7A.8090304@gmail.com>
References: <be8c8d780902230203k5f0ffb38m97d817aff9d95554@mail.gmail.com> <49A31B60.9050604@gmail.com> <49A31CD5.4090204@earthlink.net> <be8c8d780902250757g12d3de5kb580add50cf6f6c0@mail.gmail.com> <49A56C7A.8090304@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v753.1)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; delsp="yes"; format="flowed"
Message-Id: <B7C83F8B-514E-4531-B2BE-12A3AB7C25E0@thomasclausen.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Thomas Heide Clausen <ietf@thomasclausen.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 23:35:28 +0100
To: Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.753.1)
Cc: autoconf@ietf.org, Emmanuel Baccelli <Emmanuel.Baccelli@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Autoconf] updated draft on aspects of multi-hop wireless communication
X-BeenThere: autoconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ad-Hoc Network Autoconfiguration WG discussion list <autoconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf>, <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/autoconf>
List-Post: <mailto:autoconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf>, <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 22:33:23 -0000
On Feb 25, 2009, at 17:06 PM, Alexandru Petrescu wrote: > Emmanuel Baccelli a écrit : >> Alex, I think that what Charlie and Thomas want to say is basically: >> - A router typically has several physical interfaces >> - A router typically has just one MANET interface (although it may >> have several) >> - A router may have just one physical interface (for instance its >> MANET interface) > > Emmanuel, I agree with the first definition in the list. I think > it's probably the most widely accepted definition, among the three. > > However, the draft pictures a router with only one interface, which > is only the third in the list. > I think that the point is that in a MANET as it is commonly deployed, one quite often find routers which have just one physical interface. Thomas > Alex > >> Emmanuel >> On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 11:01 PM, Charles E. Perkins >> <charles.perkins@earthlink.net >> <mailto:charles.perkins@earthlink.net>> wrote: >> Hello Alex, >> On this point I disagree. I think it is better to show the >> routers with a single network interface -- which is what >> they have in real life. This is also the reason that techniques >> like split horizon aren't appropriate. >> Regards, >> Charlie P. >> Alexandru Petrescu wrote: >> Emmanuel, AUTOCONFers, >> Just a short clarifying point: I think it would be >> clarifying to >> illustrate the routers to have two interfaces. Routers with >> only one >> interface aren't very typical. >> Just a note, >> Alex >> Emmanuel Baccelli a écrit : >> Hi all, >> following the fruitful discussions about initial >> version of >> the document, here is an update to the draft describing >> aspects of >> multi-hop wireless communication: >> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-baccelli- >> multi-hop-wireless-communication-01.txt >> Again, the goal of this document is to identify a >> consensus >> about >> this topic, and then use this to move on quicker with the >> rest of the >> work... >> Please review it, and provide feedback as soon as >> possible. >> Cheers >> Emmanuel >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> --- >> _______________________________________________ Autoconf >> mailing list >> Autoconf@ietf.org <mailto:Autoconf@ietf.org> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf >> _______________________________________________ >> Autoconf mailing list >> Autoconf@ietf.org <mailto:Autoconf@ietf.org> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> --- >> _______________________________________________ >> Autoconf mailing list >> Autoconf@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf > > > _______________________________________________ > Autoconf mailing list > Autoconf@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
- [Autoconf] updated draft on aspects of multi-hop … Emmanuel Baccelli
- Re: [Autoconf] updated draft on aspects of multi-… Paul Lambert
- Re: [Autoconf] updated draft on aspects of multi-… Emmanuel Baccelli
- Re: [Autoconf] updated draft on aspects of multi-… Charles E. Perkins
- Re: [Autoconf] updated draft on aspects of multi-… Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [Autoconf] updated draft on aspects of multi-… Charles E. Perkins
- Re: [Autoconf] updated draft on aspects of multi-… Thomas Heide Clausen
- Re: [Autoconf] updated draft on aspects of multi-… Paul Lambert
- Re: [Autoconf] updated draft on aspects of multi-… Paul Lambert
- Re: [Autoconf] updated draft on aspects of multi-… Charles E. Perkins
- Re: [Autoconf] updated draft on aspects of multi-… Rex Buddenberg
- Re: [Autoconf] updated draft on aspects of multi-… Charles E. Perkins
- Re: [Autoconf] updated draft on aspects of multi-… Rex Buddenberg
- Re: [Autoconf] updated draft on aspects of multi-… Thomas Heide Clausen
- Re: [Autoconf] updated draft on aspects of multi-… Teco Boot
- Re: [Autoconf] updated draft on aspects of multi-… Teco Boot
- Re: [Autoconf] updated draft on aspects of multi-… Teco Boot
- Re: [Autoconf] updated draft on aspects of multi-… Teco Boot
- Re: [Autoconf] updated draft on aspects of multi-… Teco Boot
- Re: [Autoconf] updated draft on aspects of multi-… Thomas Heide Clausen
- Re: [Autoconf] updated draft on aspects of multi-… Teco Boot
- Re: [Autoconf] updated draft on aspects of multi-… Emmanuel Baccelli
- Re: [Autoconf] updated draft on aspects of multi-… Emmanuel Baccelli
- Re: [Autoconf] updated draft on aspects of multi-… Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [Autoconf] updated draft on aspects of multi-… Thomas Heide Clausen
- Re: [Autoconf] updated draft on aspects of multi-… Emmanuel Baccelli
- Re: [Autoconf] updated draft on aspects of multi-… Charles E. Perkins
- Re: [Autoconf] updated draft on aspects of multi-… Charles E. Perkins
- Re: [Autoconf] updated draft on aspects of multi-… Teco Boot