Re: [Autoconf] radio neighbors in range

"Teco Boot" <teco@inf-net.nl> Fri, 27 February 2009 19:53 UTC

Return-Path: <teco@inf-net.nl>
X-Original-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCA3A3A67EC for <autoconf@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 11:53:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.752
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.752 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.294, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 16ehwvvWdR+M for <autoconf@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 11:53:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cpsmtpo-eml06.kpnxchange.com (cpsmtpo-eml06.KPNXCHANGE.COM [213.75.38.155]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F07343A688E for <autoconf@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 11:53:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cpsmtp-eml109.kpnxchange.com ([10.94.168.109]) by cpsmtpo-eml06.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 27 Feb 2009 20:53:32 +0100
Received: from M90Teco ([86.83.9.22]) by cpsmtp-eml109.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 27 Feb 2009 20:53:31 +0100
From: "Teco Boot" <teco@inf-net.nl>
To: "'Alexandru Petrescu'" <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
References: <499F0BA7.90501@piuha.net> <7E8A76F7-2CE0-463A-8EE8-8877C46B4715@gmail.com> <49A6D436.7020505@gmail.com> <000001c99845$1dc56190$595024b0$@nl> <49A6F125.40400@gmail.com> <1235680887.4585.5.camel@localhost><49A7BB89.5040807@gmail.com> <003901c998cb$42b71e90$c8255bb0$@nl><49A7E97A.2010503@gmail.com> <006801c998fd$06c5bd60$14513820$@nl> <49A8272D.2060400@gmail.com> <7FB7EE0A621BA44B8B69E5F0A09DC76407AD0C48@xmb-rtp-208.amer.cisco.com> <49A83172.70105@gmail.com> <49A832DF.4040805@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <49A832DF.4040805@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 20:53:31 +0100
Message-ID: <007e01c99915$10eb9f90$32c2deb0$@nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: AcmZCm6JX76zgbd9ROiQjfnWG+Bb8gACkaSw
Content-Language: nl
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Feb 2009 19:53:31.0998 (UTC) FILETIME=[1146B7E0:01C99915]
Cc: autoconf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Autoconf] radio neighbors in range
X-BeenThere: autoconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ad-Hoc Network Autoconfiguration WG discussion list <autoconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf>, <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/autoconf>
List-Post: <mailto:autoconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf>, <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 19:53:10 -0000

Alex,

Any idea how to enforce such a restriction to the MANET users?
Use 100m Cat5 cables, folded by four?

And what if the teapot suddenly passes by?

Teco.

|-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
|Van: Alexandru Petrescu [mailto:alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com]
|Verzonden: vrijdag 27 februari 2009 19:37
|Aan: Stan Ratliff (sratliff)
|CC: Teco Boot; autoconf@ietf.org
|Onderwerp: radio neighbors in range
|
|To my understanding, mentioning radio neighbors in range implies we
|discover they're risking hidden-terminal and non-transitive problems.
|
|Neighbors in fully transitive range with exposed terminals would be more
|precise.
|
|Alex