IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Autoconf] Call for comments to a new AUTOCONF charter proposal.

Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano <cjbc@it.uc3m.es> Wed, 30 June 2010 11:26 UTC

Return-Path: <cjbc@it.uc3m.es>
X-Original-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15B293A67D9 for <autoconf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 04:26:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.482
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.482 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.217, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_21=0.6, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4QZmo0Rc50rp for <autoconf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 04:26:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp02.uc3m.es (smtp02.uc3m.es [163.117.176.132]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B02E23A67DA for <autoconf@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 04:26:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-uc3m-safe: yes
Received: from [163.117.139.72] (acorde.it.uc3m.es [163.117.139.72]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp02.uc3m.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A4D26C9154; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 13:26:44 +0200 (CEST)
From: Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano <cjbc@it.uc3m.es>
To: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <4C2A5CFB.9070806@piuha.net>
References: <BFD8FF22-FD36-436E-9985-7BFA2E234081@gmail.com> <1277810132.4261.9.camel@acorde.it.uc3m.es> <4C2A5CFB.9070806@piuha.net>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-x07tQnCl+jjtqoGWp6/i"
Organization: Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 13:27:44 +0200
Message-ID: <1277897264.4261.121.camel@acorde.it.uc3m.es>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.1.2
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.0.0.3116-6.0.0.1038-17476.006
Cc: "autoconf@ietf.org autoconf@ietf.org" <autoconf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Autoconf] Call for comments to a new AUTOCONF charter proposal.
X-BeenThere: autoconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: cjbc@it.uc3m.es
List-Id: Ad-Hoc Network Autoconfiguration WG discussion list <autoconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf>, <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/autoconf>
List-Post: <mailto:autoconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf>, <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 11:26:36 -0000

Hi Jari,

On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 23:52 +0300, Jari Arkko wrote:
> Carlos,
> 
> > I strongly believe that analyzing the
> > existing solution space is a step that would help a lot in designing a
> > solution. We have been working in the past on solutions surveys and
> > problem space analysis:
> >   
> 
> I think a solution analysis document would be a useful output from the 
> working group, particularly if we already have a good start an existing 
> paper or draft. Thanks for the suggestion! I think we should add it to 
> the charter.

Thanks.

> 
> (I'm a little reluctant to tie the completion of such a document to the 
> start of solution work, however. Particularly if we can identify a 
> simple first step solution such as DHCP that requires no new protocols.)

Agree on that.

Carlos

> 
> Jari
> 

-- 
Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano     http://www.netcoms.net
GPG FP: D29B 0A6A 639A A561 93CA  4D55 35DC BA4D D170 4F67

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email