Re: [Autoconf] RFC 5889 (Was: Call for comments to a new AUTOCONF charter proposal)

"Dearlove, Christopher (UK)" <Chris.Dearlove@baesystems.com> Thu, 22 July 2010 09:41 UTC

Return-Path: <Chris.Dearlove@baesystems.com>
X-Original-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0299C3A6A50 for <autoconf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Jul 2010 02:41:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.058
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.058 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.459, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yxnc2Rajj9Pl for <autoconf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Jul 2010 02:41:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ukmta3.baesystems.com (ukmta3.baesystems.com [20.133.40.55]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C32CB3A6855 for <autoconf@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Jul 2010 02:41:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.55,242,1278284400"; d="scan'208";a="77814387"
Received: from unknown (HELO baemasodc004.greenlnk.net) ([10.108.36.11]) by Baemasodc001ir.sharelnk.net with ESMTP; 22 Jul 2010 10:42:02 +0100
Received: from glkms1103.GREENLNK.NET (glkms1103.greenlnk.net [10.108.36.194]) by baemasodc004.greenlnk.net (Switch-3.4.3/Switch-3.4.3) with ESMTP id o6M9g28Y016149; Thu, 22 Jul 2010 10:42:02 +0100
Received: from GLKMS2100.GREENLNK.NET ([10.15.184.93]) by glkms1103.GREENLNK.NET with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 22 Jul 2010 10:42:02 +0100
x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 10:42:00 +0100
Message-ID: <ABE739C5ADAC9A41ACCC72DF366B719D0344F844@GLKMS2100.GREENLNK.NET>
In-Reply-To: <4C481114.8000706@gmail.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
thread-topic: [Autoconf] RFC 5889 (Was: Call for comments to a new AUTOCONF charter proposal)
thread-index: AcspgVsMnax3uxGET0OgNkTWYBjfyAAALTeg
References: <4C2A6BB7.1000900@piuha.net><4C2CFADD.3040909@piuha.net> <4C378C29.2040302@oracle.com><4C4706D8.5040904@piuha.net> <4C473D4C.8050504@gmail.com> <ABE739C5ADAC9A41ACCC72DF366B719D0344F7B9@GLKMS2100.GREENLNK.NET> <4C480A3F.3000103@gmail.com> <ABE739C5ADAC9A41ACCC72DF366B719D0344F804@GLKMS2100.GREENLNK.NET> <4C481114.8000706@gmail.com>
From: "Dearlove, Christopher (UK)" <Chris.Dearlove@baesystems.com>
To: "Alexandru Petrescu" <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Jul 2010 09:42:02.0190 (UTC) FILETIME=[231ECEE0:01CB2982]
Cc: autoconf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Autoconf] RFC 5889 (Was: Call for comments to a new AUTOCONF charter proposal)
X-BeenThere: autoconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ad-Hoc Network Autoconfiguration WG discussion list <autoconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf>, <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/autoconf>
List-Post: <mailto:autoconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf>, <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 09:41:47 -0000

See the reference quoted. And you've been an RFC author, you've
been through it.

The text concentrates on editorial stuff (getting references right,
that sort of thing). And my experience was largely about grammar,
punctuation and capitalisation (lots of that one). But as I read
it technical errors would probably be in scope. But rewriting the
recommendations is definitely not if I am any judge at all.

-- 
Christopher Dearlove
Technology Leader, Communications Group
Networks, Security and Information Systems Department
BAE Systems Advanced Technology Centre
West Hanningfield Road, Great Baddow, Chelmsford, CM2 8HN, UK
Tel: +44 1245 242194  Fax: +44 1245 242124

BAE Systems (Operations) Limited
Registered Office: Warwick House, PO Box 87,
Farnborough Aerospace Centre, Farnborough, Hants, GU14 6YU, UK
Registered in England & Wales No: 1996687

-----Original Message-----
From: Alexandru Petrescu [mailto:alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com] 
Sent: 22 July 2010 10:36
To: Dearlove, Christopher (UK)
Cc: autoconf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Autoconf] RFC 5889 (Was: Call for comments to a new AUTOCONF charter proposal)


                    *** WARNING ***

  This message has originated outside your organisation,
  either from an external partner or the Global Internet. 
      Keep this in mind if you answer this message.
 

Could you positively say what an AUTH48 _does_ cover?

I understand what it does _not_ cover.

I also understand that 48hours is _not_ the point.

Alex

Le 22/07/2010 11:14, Dearlove, Christopher (UK) a écrit :
> AUTH48 is a formal RFC Editor state, as you should know. I
> believe that 48 did originally refer to 48 hours, but that's
> not the point (though it is a strong hint). The point is what
> AUTH48 covers, which is not a technical rewrite.
>
> What RFC did or does stand for is irrelevant to this.
>




********************************************************************
This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended
recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender.
You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or
distribute its contents to any other person.
********************************************************************