[Autoconf] problems, gaps?
Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com> Fri, 26 March 2010 16:16 UTC
Return-Path: <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 9D5FE3A6BAB for <autoconf@core3.amsl.com>;
Fri, 26 Mar 2010 09:16:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.37
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No,
score=0.37 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-1.11,
DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS=1.13, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZfDL9LKx9QuZ for
<autoconf@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 09:16:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oxalide-out.extra.cea.fr (oxalide-out.extra.cea.fr
[132.168.224.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 563E03A6B5B for
<autoconf@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 09:15:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by
oxalide.extra.cea.fr (8.14.2/8.14.2/CEAnet-Internet-out-2.0) with ESMTP id
o2QGFK8e017729 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256
verify=NOT) for <autoconf@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 17:15:20 +0100
Received: from muguet1.intra.cea.fr (muguet1.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.6]) by
pisaure.intra.cea.fr (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o2QGFKpC030826 for
<autoconf@ietf.org>;
Fri, 26 Mar 2010 17:15:20 +0100 (envelope-from alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([132.166.133.173]) by muguet1.intra.cea.fr
(8.13.8/8.13.8/CEAnet-Intranet-out-1.1) with ESMTP id o2QGFJTk023259 for
<autoconf@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 17:15:20 +0100
Message-ID: <4BACDD97.9040601@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 17:15:19 +0100
From: Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; fr;
rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "autoconf@ietf.org" <autoconf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Autoconf] problems, gaps?
X-BeenThere: autoconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ad-Hoc Network Autoconfiguration WG discussion list
<autoconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf>,
<mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/autoconf>
List-Post: <mailto:autoconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf>,
<mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:16:47 -0000
CP says the problem is: allocate addresses in ad-hoc networks. I disagree. My problem is mostly related to prefixes, not addresses. Allocating addesses and prefixes is not the same. Alex
- [Autoconf] problems, gaps? Alexandru Petrescu