Re: [Autoconf] updated draft on aspects of multi-hop wireless communication

Emmanuel Baccelli <Emmanuel.Baccelli@inria.fr> Wed, 25 February 2009 15:57 UTC

Return-Path: <emmanuel.baccelli@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 469E83A6A87 for <autoconf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 07:57:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.887
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.887 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.089, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0g6SVy7qyqJN for <autoconf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 07:57:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-fx0-f176.google.com (mail-fx0-f176.google.com [209.85.220.176]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED5773A6805 for <autoconf@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 07:57:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by fxm24 with SMTP id 24so45943fxm.37 for <autoconf@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 07:57:27 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=ExyThFxvmh/x7zVmmgBd3ZKaPmDEmgK/VOTRbLYfWpY=; b=TUZ+uCfb/i/4dXr511GLNO5JIGNh88b8wlgA6PHNy7wEyVhkcwRlSV62hEUeWFpSYY +vMTGuELt8hTmG7EwlQOwqWAeApyHBPgUTKpN24pS2pqtD44qUmGk+pEhOntEH1nHqfh CNi+A88rm75ob6VXMy5FCY9j2Z7Ne4p9J5wBo=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=CL0WM7atwkYwSCKVAwHbbJjDMz6wVrKAskmSiVvnunE/gieyoH5YGLwYIKY8G94FrV zwtl56aq81pPFQjaesXzUw/OUa4BQWgvYCz2NVQ+ezhdJflWqyK4pnFskB5Vep+7MMcc GDEKZelIh7dH0gsAhxvpnJY3rnmWGxeGViDZA=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: emmanuel.baccelli@gmail.com
Received: by 10.103.24.17 with SMTP id b17mr139575muj.21.1235577447804; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 07:57:27 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <49A31CD5.4090204@earthlink.net>
References: <be8c8d780902230203k5f0ffb38m97d817aff9d95554@mail.gmail.com> <49A31B60.9050604@gmail.com> <49A31CD5.4090204@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 16:57:27 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 3e0d5acaefff2b3a
Message-ID: <be8c8d780902250757g12d3de5kb580add50cf6f6c0@mail.gmail.com>
From: Emmanuel Baccelli <Emmanuel.Baccelli@inria.fr>
To: autoconf@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e65a0d86de6e320463c04a51
Subject: Re: [Autoconf] updated draft on aspects of multi-hop wireless communication
X-BeenThere: autoconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ad-Hoc Network Autoconfiguration WG discussion list <autoconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf>, <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/autoconf>
List-Post: <mailto:autoconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf>, <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 15:57:10 -0000

Alex, I think that what Charlie and Thomas want to say is basically:
- A router typically has several physical interfaces
- A router typically has just one MANET interface (although it may have
several)
- A router may have just one physical interface (for instance its MANET
interface)

Emmanuel



On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 11:01 PM, Charles E. Perkins <
charles.perkins@earthlink.net> wrote:

>
> Hello Alex,
>
> On this point I disagree.  I think it is better to show the
> routers with a single network interface -- which is what
> they have in real life.  This is also the reason that techniques
> like split horizon aren't appropriate.
>
> Regards,
> Charlie P.
>
>
> Alexandru Petrescu wrote:
>
>> Emmanuel, AUTOCONFers,
>>
>> Just a short clarifying point: I think it would be clarifying to
>> illustrate the routers to have two interfaces.  Routers with only one
>> interface aren't very typical.
>>
>> Just a note,
>>
>> Alex
>>
>> Emmanuel Baccelli a écrit :
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>>
>>> following the fruitful discussions about initial version of the document,
>>> here is an update to the draft describing aspects of
>>> multi-hop wireless communication:
>>>
>>>
>>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-baccelli-multi-hop-wireless-communication-01.txt
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Again, the goal of this document is to identify a consensus about
>>> this topic, and then use this to move on quicker with the rest of the
>>> work...
>>>
>>> Please review it, and provide feedback as soon as possible.
>>>
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>>
>>> Emmanuel
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list
>>>  Autoconf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Autoconf mailing list
>> Autoconf@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
>>
>>
>>
>