Re: [Autoconf] Next steps?

Hello Alex,

Do you have drafts about how to perform
autoconfiguration using those techniques?

Regards,
Charlie P.

On 2/26/2010 12:27 PM, Alexandru Petrescu wrote:
> Hey Carlos, thanks for triggering the discussion,
>
> In the solution space I am interested in the use of link-local addresses
> and of multicast link-scoped addresses.
>
> I hope these are not forbidden by the IPv6 addressing architecture
> document, which seems to be sent to the IESG now.
>
> Alex
>
> Le 23/02/2010 12:41, Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano a écrit :
>> Hi,
>>
>> It seems that after a very long (and not free of pain sometimes)
>> process, the WG seems to be close to be done with its currently only
>> one milestone.
>>
>> I guess we now should start working on solution-space, right? If
>> that is finally the step to go, I'd like to know if the WG thinks
>> that it'd make sense / be useful to update some of the documents we
>> submitted in the past about solution space:
>>
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bernardos-autoconf-solution-space-02
>>
>>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bernardos-autoconf-evaluation-considerations-03
>
>>
>> and
>>
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bernardos-manet-autoconf-survey-04
>>
>> I think these documents can help in the solution space discussion.
>> If people are interested, we can update it taking into account the
>> current direction of the WG and the addressing-model doc, so they can
>> be used in the (hopefully) upcoming discussions.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Carlos
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing
>> list Autoconf@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
>
> _______________________________________________
> Autoconf mailing list
> Autoconf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
>