[Autoconf] Security (Was: Re: Call for comments to a new AUTOCONF charter proposal.)
HyungJin Lim <dream.hjlim@gmail.com> Wed, 30 June 2010 17:19 UTC
Return-Path: <dream.hjlim@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 944873A6A47 for <autoconf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 10:19:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.369
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.369 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.229, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2ol1s3pljq+R for <autoconf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 10:19:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vw0-f44.google.com (mail-vw0-f44.google.com [209.85.212.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70E983A67AF for <autoconf@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 10:19:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by vws10 with SMTP id 10so1260968vws.31 for <autoconf@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 10:20:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=k2JnTKM0g0tTp16H0P2QT1tmC2mBcHL9IEsJzSDJ8/o=; b=X1q0/ceeYhQ6BN2dZk1g0kbyuvltX+KiLpZbXtmV+UtjmPnxWzazT4tep9IkBUXQ80 C96eRxbttDV1Lr4UlyidK3nUN85DisF7Qd0JXqGrE531q9Ilou+WjgtvdBD0ks6ecGxj O7rd1YC8uj15vhvu7p6UFH0Vg9H2+cvLbaQxw=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=jXZB7p1VymlwhH654NT+EAp8OcXyxRO41ZG/ps2SnrzTqQVUomOiwNH8DMBRvz2oYW Ce+67ObKieglFp4qhdOOaA3QxGoYY+V+RdPff6YiS5Qfpi850Sy1miILWU0hl6ikQiHx a3xu9zSVACHtjDcKfYJJNtSjz/GAw8pID2ipQ=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.220.168.213 with SMTP id v21mr3336708vcy.134.1277918400710; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 10:20:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.220.183.6 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 10:20:00 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 02:20:00 +0900
Message-ID: <AANLkTik946g9v_3uc0Ri9YNYZVn4WGqc_rsbnlxhtAtw@mail.gmail.com>
From: HyungJin Lim <dream.hjlim@gmail.com>
To: jari.arkko@piuha.net
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0016e65ae5a0538a6d048a429061"
Cc: autoconf@ietf.org
Subject: [Autoconf] Security (Was: Re: Call for comments to a new AUTOCONF charter proposal.)
X-BeenThere: autoconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ad-Hoc Network Autoconfiguration WG discussion list <autoconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf>, <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/autoconf>
List-Post: <mailto:autoconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf>, <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 17:19:53 -0000
Hi all, In relation to security aspects, AUTOCONF WG's need to perceive fundamental problem I think. First, we should consider performance as well as security problem. MANET can form Internet connectivity as well as stand alone network. These situation has different requirement in view point of topology. This is not cryptography problem. We know AAA(authentication, authorization, accounting) protocol and standard. Standardized AAA basically is developed for host device. So. frist, we should identify requirements that should resolve issues in AUTOCONF WG. Address configuration issue and Security is different problem and issues I think. Thanks. Hyung-Jin, Lim
- [Autoconf] Security (Was: Re: Call for comments t… HyungJin Lim