Re: [Autoconf] RFC 5889 (Was: Call for comments to a new AUTOCONF charter proposal)

Thomas Heide Clausen <thomas@thomasclausen.org> Thu, 22 July 2010 09:52 UTC

Return-Path: <thomas@thomasclausen.org>
X-Original-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A75353A69DD for <autoconf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Jul 2010 02:52:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2brHFN5mW20H for <autoconf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Jul 2010 02:52:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hgblob.mail.tigertech.net (hgblob.mail.tigertech.net [64.62.209.71]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E964B3A68A2 for <autoconf@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Jul 2010 02:52:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hgblob.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FD1D3236DB3; Thu, 22 Jul 2010 02:52:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at hgblob.tigertech.net
Received: from [192.168.147.110] (AMontsouris-552-1-55-14.w92-140.abo.wanadoo.fr [92.140.30.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hgblob.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ACAA23228BE9; Thu, 22 Jul 2010 02:52:53 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
From: Thomas Heide Clausen <thomas@thomasclausen.org>
In-Reply-To: <4C48144D.4040105@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 11:52:50 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E88A7B1C-7E79-4F0D-9E70-098D649953AB@thomasclausen.org>
References: <4C2A6BB7.1000900@piuha.net> <4C2CFADD.3040909@piuha.net> <4C378C29.2040302@oracle.com> <323812CA-4C8B-4469-AA6C-0D65191F2735@sensinode.com> <CA71B05E-5CE0-45ED-8292-398136640025@gmail.com> <AANLkTikS7QyebdP6jOXDIM-cm2vE87VgSWFAq6d6PL0v@mail.gmail.com> <4C46EFC8.6020501@piuha.net> <4C48144D.4040105@gmail.com>
To: Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081)
Cc: autoconf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Autoconf] RFC 5889 (Was: Call for comments to a new AUTOCONF charter proposal)
X-BeenThere: autoconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ad-Hoc Network Autoconfiguration WG discussion list <autoconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf>, <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/autoconf>
List-Post: <mailto:autoconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf>, <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 09:52:37 -0000

On Jul 22, 2010, at 11:50 , Alexandru Petrescu wrote:

> Le 21/07/2010 15:02, Jari Arkko a écrit :
>> I too would be fine with a title change to "Router Addressing Model in
>> Ad Hoc Networks" or even "*A* Router Addressing Model in Ad Hoc
>> Networks"...
> 
> I disagree.  There are Ad-Hoc Networks which don't use that Addressing Model.
> 
> The way link-local addresses are formed is specifically to work in ad-hoc unplanned networks... or, this draft discourages them.

Alex, I think you still don't capture that we're talking about multi-hop networks here.

Thomas


> 
> Alex
> 
>> 
>> Jari
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Autoconf mailing list
>> Autoconf@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
>> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Autoconf mailing list
> Autoconf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf