Re: [Autoconf] Call for comments to a new AUTOCONF charter proposal.

[HyungJin Lim <[e-mail]>]

Hi all,

I would like to make some input to AUTOCONF WG by a related paper.
The paper is as follows;
*"Route Optimization in Nested NEMO: Classification, Evaluation and Analysis
from NEMO Fringe Stub Perspective"*,* **IEEE Transactions on Mobile
Computing, *, VOL. 8, NO. 11, Nov. 2009

Although this paper considers address configuration issues in NEMO
viewpoint, the issues and result will be became nice input in AOTOCONF WG I
think.

We also need analysis about address configuration solutions like works
inNEMO WG.

Thanks,
Hyung-Jin, Lim

2010/6/30 Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano <[e-mail]>

> On Wed, 2010-06-30 at 01:22 +0300, Jari Arkko wrote:
>
> (text skipped)
>
> > I do get that a solution with a central node (and perhaps any solution
> > with DHCP) does not solve all needs. Would you be happier if the
> > charter had four work items:
> >
> > 1. Design space survey (Informational)
> > 2. The simple solution (such as DHCP) (PS)
> > 3. Limitations of the simple solution (Informational)
> > 4. Recharter for work on the more general solution
>
> +1. I support this approach.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Carlos
>
> >
> > Jari
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Autoconf mailing list
> > [e-mail]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
>
>  --
> Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano     http://www.netcoms.net
> GPG FP: D29B 0A6A 639A A561 93CA  4D55 35DC BA4D D170 4F67
>
> _______________________________________________
> Autoconf mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
>
>