Re: [Autoconf] Summary of re-chartering discussions.

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Tue, 20 July 2010 08:42 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93E733A69A4 for <autoconf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 01:42:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.088
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.088 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.511, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yojTWlcrNXAQ for <autoconf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 01:42:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2001:14b8:400::130]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A26DF3A67A4 for <autoconf@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 01:42:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0418B2CECD; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 11:42:46 +0300 (EEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HUIv4ROCG0or; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 11:42:45 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (unknown [IPv6:2001:14b8:400::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 932712CC9A; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 11:42:44 +0300 (EEST)
Message-ID: <4C456182.4090700@piuha.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 10:42:42 +0200
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100411)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ryuji Wakikawa <ryuji.wakikawa@gmail.com>
References: <88FBF3FE-D9BE-4085-B73D-DCA08BA454CF@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <88FBF3FE-D9BE-4085-B73D-DCA08BA454CF@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "autoconf@ietf.org autoconf@ietf.org" <autoconf@ietf.org>, Thomas Clausen <thomas@thomasclausen.org>
Subject: Re: [Autoconf] Summary of re-chartering discussions.
X-BeenThere: autoconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ad-Hoc Network Autoconfiguration WG discussion list <autoconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf>, <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/autoconf>
List-Post: <mailto:autoconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf>, <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 08:42:32 -0000

Ryuji, all,

For what it is worth -- and having followed the discussions -- I don't 
mind the working group picking up the distributed design work 
immediately in the new charter. However, I still want to see the 
specification of what current protocols (DHCP) can achieve unchanged. 
The description of the limitations of that solution is a natural step of 
developing the distributed solution, along with design space analysis 
and other steps that people have mentioned.

Jari