IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Autoconf] Next steps?

Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano <cjbc@it.uc3m.es> Tue, 23 February 2010 11:39 UTC

Return-Path: <cjbc@it.uc3m.es>
X-Original-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 189E828C192 for <autoconf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 03:39:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.466
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.466 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.233, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_21=0.6, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t1nuwNyrdY5A for <autoconf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 03:39:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp01.uc3m.es (smtp01.uc3m.es [163.117.176.131]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B79328C1B5 for <autoconf@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 03:39:47 -0800 (PST)
X-uc3m-safe: yes
Received: from [163.117.139.72] (acorde.it.uc3m.es [163.117.139.72]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp01.uc3m.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0380BA9E20 for <autoconf@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 12:41:47 +0100 (CET)
From: Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano <cjbc@it.uc3m.es>
To: autoconf@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-cC/vrXnqiPNoJVT/zswl"
Organization: Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 12:41:51 +0100
Message-ID: <1266925311.4036.71.camel@acorde.it.uc3m.es>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.2
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.0.0.3116-6.0.0.1038-17162.002
Subject: [Autoconf] Next steps?
X-BeenThere: autoconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: cjbc@it.uc3m.es
List-Id: Ad-Hoc Network Autoconfiguration WG discussion list <autoconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf>, <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/autoconf>
List-Post: <mailto:autoconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf>, <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 11:39:50 -0000

Hi,

	It seems that after a very long (and not free of pain sometimes)
process, the WG seems to be close to be done with its currently only one
milestone.

	I guess we now should start working on solution-space, right? If that
is finally the step to go, I'd like to know if the WG thinks that it'd
make sense / be useful to update some of the documents we submitted in
the past about solution space:

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bernardos-autoconf-solution-space-02 
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bernardos-autoconf-evaluation-considerations-03

and 

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bernardos-manet-autoconf-survey-04

I think these documents can help in the solution space discussion. If
people are interested, we can update it taking into account the current
direction of the WG and the addressing-model doc, so they can be used in
the (hopefully) upcoming discussions.

Thanks,

Carlos

-- 
Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano     http://www.netcoms.net
GPG FP: D29B 0A6A 639A A561 93CA  4D55 35DC BA4D D170 4F67

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email