IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Autoconf] Call for comments to a new AUTOCONF charter proposal.

Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano <cjbc@it.uc3m.es> Wed, 30 June 2010 11:29 UTC

Return-Path: <cjbc@it.uc3m.es>
X-Original-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93C4C3A68A7 for <autoconf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 04:29:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.513
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.513 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.186, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_21=0.6, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tNJahUDa7C0s for <autoconf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 04:29:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp03.uc3m.es (smtp03.uc3m.es [163.117.176.133]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 788473A6878 for <autoconf@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 04:29:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-uc3m-safe: yes
Received: from [163.117.139.72] (acorde.it.uc3m.es [163.117.139.72]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp03.uc3m.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C2157FD7A7; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 13:29:41 +0200 (CEST)
From: Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano <cjbc@it.uc3m.es>
To: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <4C2A723E.3020806@piuha.net>
References: <BFD8FF22-FD36-436E-9985-7BFA2E234081@gmail.com> <201006290803.34192.henning.rogge@fkie.fraunhofer.de> <ABE739C5ADAC9A41ACCC72DF366B719D0333F14C@GLKMS2100.GREENLNK.NET> <4C2A723E.3020806@piuha.net>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-dt1D6V6iZo17lVRto051"
Organization: Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 13:30:41 +0200
Message-ID: <1277897441.4261.122.camel@acorde.it.uc3m.es>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.1.2
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.0.0.3116-6.0.0.1038-17476.006
Cc: autoconf@ietf.org, "Dearlove, Christopher (UK)" <Chris.Dearlove@baesystems.com>
Subject: Re: [Autoconf] Call for comments to a new AUTOCONF charter proposal.
X-BeenThere: autoconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: cjbc@it.uc3m.es
List-Id: Ad-Hoc Network Autoconfiguration WG discussion list <autoconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf>, <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/autoconf>
List-Post: <mailto:autoconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf>, <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 11:29:32 -0000

On Wed, 2010-06-30 at 01:22 +0300, Jari Arkko wrote:

(text skipped)

> I do get that a solution with a central node (and perhaps any solution
> with DHCP) does not solve all needs. Would you be happier if the
> charter had four work items:
> 
> 1. Design space survey (Informational)
> 2. The simple solution (such as DHCP) (PS)
> 3. Limitations of the simple solution (Informational)
> 4. Recharter for work on the more general solution

+1. I support this approach.

Thanks,

Carlos

> 
> Jari
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Autoconf mailing list
> Autoconf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf

-- 
Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano     http://www.netcoms.net
GPG FP: D29B 0A6A 639A A561 93CA  4D55 35DC BA4D D170 4F67

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email