Re: [Autoconf] Another addressing model for AUTOCONF

Teco Boot <teco@inf-net.nl> Fri, 23 July 2010 13:22 UTC

Return-Path: <teco@inf-net.nl>
X-Original-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0A4A3A69FF for <autoconf@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Jul 2010 06:22:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xdfbQxgCAZv9 for <autoconf@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Jul 2010 06:22:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ey0-f172.google.com (mail-ey0-f172.google.com [209.85.215.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A871A3A69FC for <autoconf@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Jul 2010 06:22:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by eyb7 with SMTP id 7so42540eyb.31 for <autoconf@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Jul 2010 06:23:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.213.28.204 with SMTP id n12mr604135ebc.30.1279891382346; Fri, 23 Jul 2010 06:23:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.128.0.173] ([77.61.241.196]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v59sm374662eeh.16.2010.07.23.06.23.01 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 23 Jul 2010 06:23:02 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Teco Boot <teco@inf-net.nl>
In-Reply-To: <4C4987EC.3000500@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 15:23:01 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <7760A358-F35E-4868-9580-9F2324B07F11@inf-net.nl>
References: <4C48B1AE.2030408@gmail.com> <672CA84A-1850-4B17-922F-AE75D4CF961B@inf-net.nl> <4C4987EC.3000500@gmail.com>
To: Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081)
Cc: "autoconf@ietf.org" <autoconf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Autoconf] Another addressing model for AUTOCONF
X-BeenThere: autoconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ad-Hoc Network Autoconfiguration WG discussion list <autoconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf>, <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/autoconf>
List-Post: <mailto:autoconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf>, <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 13:22:45 -0000

Op 23 jul 2010, om 14:15 heeft Alexandru Petrescu het volgende geschreven:

>> And I dislike the address spoofing mode, suggested in slide 4.
> 
> WEll no, I don't suggest any address spoofing mode.  What in slide4 makes you think so?  I could explain. (see jpg attached).

You depict multiple addresses with FE80::FFFE_MAC1 and FE80::FFFE_MAC2.
You have dup L2 addresses (please destroy your stuff), or you spoof addresses (please don't).

Teco