Re: [Autoconf] Next steps?

Hey Carlos, thanks for triggering the discussion,

In the solution space I am interested in the use of link-local addresses
and of multicast link-scoped addresses.

I hope these are not forbidden by the IPv6 addressing architecture
document, which seems to be sent to the IESG now.

Alex

Le 23/02/2010 12:41, Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> It seems that after a very long (and not free of pain sometimes)
> process, the WG seems to be close to be done with its currently only
> one milestone.
>
> I guess we now should start working on solution-space, right? If
> that is finally the step to go, I'd like to know if the WG thinks
> that it'd make sense / be useful to update some of the documents we
> submitted in the past about solution space:
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bernardos-autoconf-solution-space-02
>
>
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bernardos-autoconf-evaluation-considerations-03
>
> and
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bernardos-manet-autoconf-survey-04
>
> I think these documents can help in the solution space discussion.
> If people are interested, we can update it taking into account the
> current direction of the WG and the addressing-model doc, so they can
> be used in the (hopefully) upcoming discussions.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Carlos
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing
> list Autoconf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf