Re: [Autoconf] Autoconf addressing model

"Teco Boot" <teco@inf-net.nl> Thu, 05 March 2009 17:29 UTC

Return-Path: <teco@inf-net.nl>
X-Original-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D779C28C4D9 for <autoconf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Mar 2009 09:29:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.785
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.785 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.261, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DT4mGLNSUnaI for <autoconf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Mar 2009 09:29:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cpsmtpo-eml06.kpnxchange.com (cpsmtpo-eml06.KPNXCHANGE.COM [213.75.38.155]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE3AA28C4D8 for <autoconf@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Mar 2009 09:29:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cpsmtp-eml102.kpnxchange.com ([213.75.84.102]) by cpsmtpo-eml06.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 5 Mar 2009 18:29:58 +0100
Received: from M90Teco ([86.83.9.22]) by cpsmtp-eml102.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 5 Mar 2009 18:29:58 +0100
From: "Teco Boot" <teco@inf-net.nl>
To: "'Dearlove, Christopher \(UK\)'" <chris.dearlove@baesystems.com>, "'Alexandru Petrescu'" <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
References: <499F0BA7.90501@piuha.net> <49AD5184.6080300@gmail.com> <000101c99c3c$3121a870$9364f950$@nl><49AD9760.3080909@gmail.com> <49AD98D4.3@earthlink.net><49AD9EA8.6040803@gmail.com> <49ADA17B.9040600@earthlink.net><49ADAF7C.1050509@gmail.com> <49ADB9FB.6050600@earthlink.net><49AE3A3A.5000305@gmail.com> <7FB7EE0A621BA44B8B69E5F0A09DC76407B5D783@xmb-rtp-208.amer.cisco.com> <49AE9827.5090309@gmail.com> <7FB7EE0A621BA44B8B69E5F0A09DC76407B5D803@xmb-rtp-208.amer.cisco.com> <49AEBA6D.7030903@gmail.com> <7FB7EE0A621BA44B8B69E5F0A09DC76407B5DB1F@xmb-rtp-208.amer.cisco.com><49AF97FA.70200! 07@gmail.com><002201c99d76$017d4b20$0477e160$@nl> <49AFAA15.9!060905@gmail.com> <003a01c99d8e$f47ba2f0$dd72e8d0$@nl><49AFD85E.50403! 01@gmail.com><004a01c99d9b$542e1e10$fc8a5a30$@nl> <49AFDE93.60!904@gmail.com> <004b01c99da1$dc4ab9b0$94e02d10$@nl> <49AFEB3C!.8010703@gmail.com> <004c01c99da7$ee315700$ca940500$@nl><49AFF! 2B7.2060600@gmail.com><005701c99db0$adbc6620$09353260$@nl> <49B 0026F.50! 70905@gma il.co m> < 006401c99db5$cad6dc90$608495b0$@nl> <ABE739C5ADAC9A41ACCC72DF366B719D01A449C1@GLKMS2100.GREENLNK.NET>
In-Reply-To: <ABE739C5ADAC9A41ACCC72DF366B719D01A449C1@GLKMS2100.GREENLNK.NET>
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 18:29:59 +0100
Message-ID: <006b01c99db8$022f7e20$068e7a60$@nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: AcmdskVZSJJpFDLNSjiyXnScCr9J0QAAfZ5gAABwngAAADLCkA==
Content-Language: nl
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Mar 2009 17:29:58.0579 (UTC) FILETIME=[01C1C830:01C99DB8]
Cc: autoconf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Autoconf] Autoconf addressing model
X-BeenThere: autoconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ad-Hoc Network Autoconfiguration WG discussion list <autoconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf>, <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/autoconf>
List-Post: <mailto:autoconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf>, <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2009 17:29:30 -0000

OK, I can agree. My point was verifying that we had the basic setup. Assume
a bootstrapping setup of a disconnected network, then we would not have the
2001: prefix. A self-generated ULA prefix can be used. As a next step, the
globally unique addresses can be added or may replace the ULA.


Teco.

|-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
|Van: Dearlove, Christopher (UK) [mailto:chris.dearlove@baesystems.com]
|Verzonden: donderdag 5 maart 2009 18:19
|Aan: Teco Boot; Alexandru Petrescu
|CC: autoconf@ietf.org
|Onderwerp: RE: [Autoconf] Autoconf addressing model
|
|
|> I see a problem with this, who has assigned the globally unique
|prefixes?
|
|Isn't that (part of) the problem this group is to address?
|At this point we are specifying a requirement that (assuming
|that model, which I'm not commenting on) such prefixes are
|to be assigned. How it happens (as long as it's possible, and
|manual configuration, though not the required solution, is
|presumably an existence proof for that) is not the issue
|right now.
|
|
|********************************************************************
|This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended
|recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
|recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender.
|You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or
|distribute its contents to any other person.
|********************************************************************