Re: [Autoconf] Call for comments to a new AUTOCONF charter proposal.

Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano <cjbc@it.uc3m.es> Tue, 29 June 2010 11:15 UTC

Return-Path: <cjbc@it.uc3m.es>
X-Original-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B13E93A6994 for <autoconf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 04:15:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.439
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.439 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.260, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_21=0.6, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NQa3WjuGci1d for <autoconf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 04:15:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp03.uc3m.es (smtp03.uc3m.es [163.117.176.133]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D5673A6AA9 for <autoconf@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 04:14:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-uc3m-safe: yes
Received: from [163.117.139.72] (acorde.it.uc3m.es [163.117.139.72]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp03.uc3m.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94F2022D59; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 13:14:54 +0200 (CEST)
From: Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano <cjbc@it.uc3m.es>
To: "Dearlove, Christopher (UK)" <Chris.Dearlove@baesystems.com>
In-Reply-To: <ABE739C5ADAC9A41ACCC72DF366B719D0333F14C@GLKMS2100.GREENLNK.NET>
References: <BFD8FF22-FD36-436E-9985-7BFA2E234081@gmail.com> <201006290803.34192.henning.rogge@fkie.fraunhofer.de> <ABE739C5ADAC9A41ACCC72DF366B719D0333F14C@GLKMS2100.GREENLNK.NET>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-4QFKfssD+kkhyYuCa4ER"
Organization: Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 13:15:54 +0200
Message-ID: <1277810154.4261.10.camel@acorde.it.uc3m.es>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.1.2
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.0.0.3116-6.0.0.1038-17474.006
Cc: autoconf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Autoconf] Call for comments to a new AUTOCONF charter proposal.
X-BeenThere: autoconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: cjbc@it.uc3m.es
List-Id: Ad-Hoc Network Autoconfiguration WG discussion list <autoconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf>, <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/autoconf>
List-Post: <mailto:autoconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf>, <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 11:15:05 -0000

On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 10:04 +0100, Dearlove, Christopher (UK) wrote:
> > Does this proposal mean the autoconf group will not work on a
> distributed 
> > address configuration scheme for mesh networks ?
> 
> Same question, except I'd stick with the terminology ad hoc network.
> A centralised distribution mechanism is a very poor fit to much of
> what's attractive about an ad hoc network, and a very poor fit (due
> to having a single point of failure) to many application areas for
> ad hoc networks.

Agree.

Carlos

> 
> This is not the direction I for one had hoped that the Autoconf WG
> would go in. I note the reference to "future extensions", but first
> I assume that this is not chartered work, and second that forces
> decentralised work into a certain shape, rather than working from
> the problem more generally.
> 
> I appreciate that the WG can only work on solutions that people are
> prepared to work on, and unfortunately I can't offer the effort needed
> to make a concrete alternative proposal. I think however I've put in
> at least my share of work in the Manet WG.
> 
> Incidentally the charter refers to RFC 5889, which is not yet published.
> I see that is in AUTH48, but noted as on hold for a technical issue.
> AUTH48 seems rather late for a technical issue, unless meaning a
> publication technical issue rather than an engineering technical issue.
> 
> ********************************************************************
> This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended
> recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
> recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender.
> You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or
> distribute its contents to any other person.
> ********************************************************************
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Autoconf mailing list
> Autoconf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf

-- 
Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano     http://www.netcoms.net
GPG FP: D29B 0A6A 639A A561 93CA  4D55 35DC BA4D D170 4F67