Re: [Autoconf] RFC 5889 (Was: Call for comments to a new AUTOCONF charter proposal)

Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com> Thu, 22 July 2010 15:09 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 110CF3A6A66 for <autoconf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Jul 2010 08:09:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.063
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.063 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.186, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S8EQj2owlh-h for <autoconf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Jul 2010 08:09:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oxalide-out.extra.cea.fr (oxalide-out.extra.cea.fr [132.168.224.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF27F3A6B99 for <autoconf@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Jul 2010 08:09:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by oxalide.extra.cea.fr (8.14.2/8.14.2/CEAnet-Internet-out-2.0) with ESMTP id o6MFA23v004864 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for <autoconf@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Jul 2010 17:10:02 +0200
Received: from muguet2.intra.cea.fr (muguet2.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.7]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o6MFA2Va009428 for <autoconf@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Jul 2010 17:10:02 +0200 (envelope-from alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([132.166.133.173]) by muguet2.intra.cea.fr (8.13.8/8.13.8/CEAnet-Intranet-out-1.1) with ESMTP id o6MFA14L017137 for <autoconf@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Jul 2010 17:10:02 +0200
Message-ID: <4C485F49.60606@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 17:10:01 +0200
From: Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; fr; rv:1.9.2.7) Gecko/20100713 Thunderbird/3.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: autoconf@ietf.org
References: <4C2A6BB7.1000900@piuha.net> <4C2CFADD.3040909@piuha.net> <4C378C29.2040302@oracle.com> <323812CA-4C8B-4469-AA6C-0D65191F2735@sensinode.com> <CA71B05E-5CE0-45ED-8292-398136640025@gmail.com> <AANLkTikS7QyebdP6jOXDIM-cm2vE87VgSWFAq6d6PL0v@mail.gmail.com> <4C46EFC8.6020501@piuha.net> <4C48144D.4040105@gmail.com> <E88A7B1C-7E79-4F0D-9E70-098D649953AB@thomasclausen.org> <4C4815B4.6020907@gmail.com> <2310E7B5-FB7C-4EAE-9640-E2A6957CCF7D@thomasclausen.org> <4C482D52.4010306@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4C482D52.4010306@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [Autoconf] RFC 5889 (Was: Call for comments to a new AUTOCONF charter proposal)
X-BeenThere: autoconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ad-Hoc Network Autoconfiguration WG discussion list <autoconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf>, <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/autoconf>
List-Post: <mailto:autoconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf>, <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 15:09:47 -0000

Le 22/07/2010 13:36, Alexandru Petrescu a écrit :
> Le 22/07/2010 11:58, Thomas Heide Clausen a écrit :
>>
>> On Jul 22, 2010, at 11:56 , Alexandru Petrescu wrote:
>>
>>> Le 22/07/2010 11:52, Thomas Heide Clausen a écrit :
>>>>
>>>> On Jul 22, 2010, at 11:50 , Alexandru Petrescu wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Le 21/07/2010 15:02, Jari Arkko a écrit :
>>>>>> I too would be fine with a title change to "Router
>>>>>> Addressing Model in Ad Hoc Networks" or even "*A* Router
>>>>>> Addressing Model in Ad Hoc Networks"...
>>>>>
>>>>> I disagree. There are Ad-Hoc Networks which don't use that
>>>>> Addressing Model.
>>>>>
>>>>> The way link-local addresses are formed is specifically to
>>>>> work in ad-hoc unplanned networks... or, this draft
>>>>> discourages them.
>>>>
>>>> Alex, I think you still don't capture that we're talking about
>>>> multi-hop networks here.
>>>
>>> Thomas - by multi-hop networks I mean: LFN--MR--MR--LFN is a
>>> multi-hop network using link-local addresses exclusively between
>>> MRs.
>>>
>>
>> I have no idea what LFN-MR-MR-LFN is.
>
> Are you interested to learn? The LFN--MR--MR--LFN topology and its
> multi-hop network nature is not strange to a co-Chair.
>
> There is a draft and I would like to present it during the next WG
> meeting - that could show that I do capture that we talk about
> multi-hop networks.

I have been asked privately about the draft in question - here it is:

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-petrescu-autoconf-ra-based-routing-00

    "Router Advertisements for Routing between Moving Networks"

I believe it adapted to AUTOCONF WG discussion as well, but not sure
whether Chairs accept that I present it.

I am scheduled to present it in MEXT WG too, Monday, 16h15
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/78/agenda/mext.txt

Alex
>
>> This working group is concerned with configuring MANET routers,
>> specifically the interfaces hereof over which MANET routing
>> protocols operate.
>
> Hmmm... this is something you would wish, right? Because the current
> Charter proposal stays "...independent on operation of any specific
> MANET routing protocol"...
>
> I currently agree with that way of using the word MANET in the
> current Charter proposal; but I'd suggest to remove "MANET" entirely
> from the Charter proposal, use instead agreed words.
>
> Alex
>
> _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing
> list Autoconf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
>