[Autoconf] Conclusion: draft-ietf-autoconf-adhoc-addr-model-02.txt
Ryuji Wakikawa <ryuji.wakikawa@gmail.com> Tue, 16 February 2010 19:58 UTC
Return-Path: <ryuji.wakikawa@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 2A5FB28C172 for <autoconf@core3.amsl.com>;
Tue, 16 Feb 2010 11:58:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Jlaikaob1G60 for
<autoconf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Feb 2010 11:58:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qy0-f183.google.com (mail-qy0-f183.google.com
[209.85.221.183]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4136C28C16B for
<autoconf@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Feb 2010 11:58:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: by qyk13 with SMTP id 13so3540993qyk.31 for <autoconf@ietf.org>;
Tue, 16 Feb 2010 11:59:49 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:received:received:content-type:mime-version
:subject:from:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:to :x-mailer;
bh=gtOstQSFvHZJ8de2LUHqpS/jxkknXeoXMovtdoD+Ouc=;
b=smjwyPY+oz879xdjLRBE5alMPran7v09wrA+Da40vasvNzz6n95D+DdsmVNfGN6LEU
ThKPWOsACTO/UIjSl75liX0RGBbb6ZuODgD/tRAEDz9zQsa1NSm6Q7JTsN9OQ1MJk7+O
0gZlkM3b/4kjAF3KhOG8yr5on/PFbiIHRufa8=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:date:cc
:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:to:x-mailer;
b=XeN5Sab2yNil26HYZbbd/TTCTekku4HeF9FAt0bolRgrPklsKcMN3mVP22jsE9Uwc/
SQvHxBIn09H2DdLmEZY2dQhmc+1uM86kswb5aTcSSjXmSm6R8Fsrgrpsstdysb2B+TwF
d8OqiZRxkIt6WC2l7qaoWdsI5wqEzhKeu57+I=
Received: by 10.224.107.8 with SMTP id z8mr1092366qao.275.1266350389550;
Tue, 16 Feb 2010 11:59:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?192.168.18.110? (adsl-99-49-9-50.dsl.pltn13.sbcglobal.net
[99.49.9.50]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id
7sm22139023qwb.37.2010.02.16.11.59.47 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
Tue, 16 Feb 2010 11:59:48 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077)
From: Ryuji Wakikawa <ryuji.wakikawa@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 11:59:44 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <6565C346-EBE5-425A-9291-BBCA4A9FCE27@gmail.com>
To: autoconf@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077)
Subject: [Autoconf] Conclusion: draft-ietf-autoconf-adhoc-addr-model-02.txt
X-BeenThere: autoconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ad-Hoc Network Autoconfiguration WG discussion list
<autoconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf>,
<mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/autoconf>
List-Post: <mailto:autoconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf>,
<mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 19:58:18 -0000
Dear All, We have concluded the WGLC of draft-ietf-autoconf-adhoc-addr-model-01.txt on Dec/23/09, and have a -02 document issued, following up on this. Thanks to all for all the reviews and comments to this document! After Thomas and I (Chairs) carefully reviewed discussions on the mailing list, we do find that there is rough consensus for the current document. There was an individual objection to the description of the use of link-local address, but we did not detect wide support within the working group. This objection will, of course, be reflected in the PROTO write-up that will be sent to the IESG and the ADs, and reflected in the tracker. As a conclusion, we have established rough consensus to the new document. The WG chairs will start preparing the PROTO writeup for forwarding the document. Thanks, WG chairs
- [Autoconf] Conclusion: draft-ietf-autoconf-adhoc-… Ryuji Wakikawa
- Re: [Autoconf] Conclusion: draft-ietf-autoconf-ad… Jari Arkko
- Re: [Autoconf] Conclusion: draft-ietf-autoconf-ad… Ryuji Wakikawa
- Re: [Autoconf] Conclusion: draft-ietf-autoconf-ad… Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [Autoconf] Conclusion: draft-ietf-autoconf-ad… Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [Autoconf] Conclusion: draft-ietf-autoconf-ad… Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [Autoconf] Conclusion: draft-ietf-autoconf-ad… Thomas Heide Clausen
- Re: [Autoconf] Conclusion: draft-ietf-autoconf-ad… Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [Autoconf] Conclusion: draft-ietf-autoconf-ad… Thomas Heide Clausen
- Re: [Autoconf] Conclusion: draft-ietf-autoconf-ad… Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [Autoconf] Conclusion: draft-ietf-autoconf-ad… Ryuji Wakikawa
- [Autoconf] Licensing scheme for draft-ietf-autoco… Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [Autoconf] Licensing scheme for draft-ietf-au… Zach Shelby
- Re: [Autoconf] Licensing scheme for draft-ietf-au… Henning Rogge
- Re: [Autoconf] Licensing scheme for draft-ietf-au… Ulrich Herberg
- Re: [Autoconf] Licensing scheme for draft-ietf-au… Thomas Heide Clausen
- Re: [Autoconf] Licensing scheme for draft-ietf-au… Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [Autoconf] Conclusion: draft-ietf-autoconf-ad… Charles E. Perkins
- Re: [Autoconf] Conclusion: draft-ietf-autoconf-ad… Henning Rogge
- Re: [Autoconf] Conclusion: draft-ietf-autoconf-ad… Alexandru Petrescu