IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Autoconf] Another addressing model for AUTOCONF

Teco Boot <teco@inf-net.nl> Fri, 23 July 2010 14:25 UTC

Return-Path: <teco@inf-net.nl>
X-Original-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8CA03A66B4 for <autoconf@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Jul 2010 07:25:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aN--gQ8woFRO for <autoconf@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Jul 2010 07:25:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ew0-f44.google.com (mail-ew0-f44.google.com [209.85.215.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C27A53A657C for <autoconf@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Jul 2010 07:25:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ewy22 with SMTP id 22so111599ewy.31 for <autoconf@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Jul 2010 07:26:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.213.22.201 with SMTP id o9mr3359812ebb.71.1279895173436; Fri, 23 Jul 2010 07:26:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.128.0.173] ([77.61.241.196]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v8sm468187eeh.2.2010.07.23.07.26.12 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 23 Jul 2010 07:26:13 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Teco Boot <teco@inf-net.nl>
In-Reply-To: <4C49A1B0.2010204@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 16:26:12 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <C08F0CCD-AA37-4C15-84D4-034F826C657E@inf-net.nl>
References: <4C48B1AE.2030408@gmail.com> <672CA84A-1850-4B17-922F-AE75D4CF961B@inf-net.nl> <4C4987EC.3000500@gmail.com> <7760A358-F35E-4868-9580-9F2324B07F11@inf-net.nl> <4C499A55.6080103@gmail.com> <279CC75B-84C2-4646-82E0-023DDED29C15@inf-net.nl> <4C49A1B0.2010204@gmail.com>
To: Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081)
Cc: "autoconf@ietf.org" <autoconf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Autoconf] Another addressing model for AUTOCONF
X-BeenThere: autoconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ad-Hoc Network Autoconfiguration WG discussion list <autoconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf>, <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/autoconf>
List-Post: <mailto:autoconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf>, <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 14:25:56 -0000

Op 23 jul 2010, om 16:05 heeft Alexandru Petrescu het volgende geschreven:

> 
>> Back to Autoconf: we are looking for solutions for configuring
>> addresses / prefixes for nodes that require multi-hop communication,
>> without restrictions for packet relaying via same interface, either
>> for isolated MANETs and / or for MANETs connected to the Internet.
> 
> Ok, deserves another thread, but I don't understand your "without
> restrictions for packet relaying via same interface".  My mechanism does
> not relay packets via the same interface.

Here our interests divide.

Teco

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email