Re: [Autoconf] Next steps?

Hi autoconfers,

I'm also longing for solution space... I hope we can do this "officially"
soon! In the mean time, as suggested by Carlos, I think it is a good idea to
start preparing for this next stage.

Best regards,
Emmanuel

On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 11:31 PM, Charles E. Perkins <
charles.perkins@earthlink.net> wrote:

>
> Hello folks,
>
> I am definitely in favor of getting into solution
> space, whether or not it requires rechartering :-).
>
> Regards,
> Charlie P.
>
>
>
>
> On 2/23/2010 3:41 AM, Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>        It seems that after a very long (and not free of pain sometimes)
>> process, the WG seems to be close to be done with its currently only one
>> milestone.
>>
>>        I guess we now should start working on solution-space, right? If
>> that
>> is finally the step to go, I'd like to know if the WG thinks that it'd
>> make sense / be useful to update some of the documents we submitted in
>> the past about solution space:
>>
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bernardos-autoconf-solution-space-02
>>
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bernardos-autoconf-evaluation-considerations-03
>>
>> and
>>
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bernardos-manet-autoconf-survey-04
>>
>> I think these documents can help in the solution space discussion. If
>> people are interested, we can update it taking into account the current
>> direction of the WG and the addressing-model doc, so they can be used in
>> the (hopefully) upcoming discussions.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Carlos
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Autoconf mailing list
>> Autoconf@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Autoconf mailing list
> Autoconf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
>