IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Autoconf] Updated ad hoc addressing model document

Thomas Heide Clausen <thomas@thomasclausen.org> Thu, 04 February 2010 12:43 UTC

Return-Path: <Thomas@ThomasClausen.org>
X-Original-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EDE928C1A1 for <autoconf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Feb 2010 04:43:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.001, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KE2iu0rEYhqv for <autoconf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Feb 2010 04:43:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hermes.mail.tigertech.net (hermes.mail.tigertech.net [64.62.209.72]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3DE93A683D for <autoconf@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Feb 2010 04:43:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hermes.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25EA743034E; Thu, 4 Feb 2010 04:44:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at hermes.tigertech.net
Received: from [10.0.2.6] (sphinx.lix.polytechnique.fr [129.104.11.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hermes.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E5DA43034D; Thu, 4 Feb 2010 04:44:25 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <83CA91EB-8805-44D6-AD0A-4F1288D11171@thomasclausen.org>
From: Thomas Heide Clausen <thomas@thomasclausen.org>
To: Teco Boot <teco@inf-net.nl>
In-Reply-To: <009001caa10d$8729a2a0$957ce7e0$@nl>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-70--782617295
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936)
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 13:43:11 +0100
References: <be8c8d781001260409qd23d4era0eac47eaeb3dba2@mail.gmail.com> <8DCBF4A4-7879-4148-A8FE-9A73219536B9@gmail.com> <008c01caa0fe$0eee3530$2cca9f90$@nl> <4B631699.7040504@earthlink.net> <009001caa10d$8729a2a0$957ce7e0$@nl>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936)
Cc: autoconf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Autoconf] Updated ad hoc addressing model document
X-BeenThere: autoconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ad-Hoc Network Autoconfiguration WG discussion list <autoconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf>, <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/autoconf>
List-Post: <mailto:autoconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf>, <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2010 12:43:40 -0000

On Jan 29, 2010, at 19:04 PM, Teco Boot wrote:

<SNIP>

>>
>> This isn't true.  You can build MANETs without using link-local at  
>> all
>> in any fashion.
>>
>> I'm not saying you have to ignore link-local.
>
> If LLs are configured, they are used for L2 address resolving.
> Also for MANET protocols, if destination address is LL mcast.

I do not think that this document speaks to multicast addresses at all.

Thomas

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email