[Autoconf] Could an AUTOCONF Router fail the Internet?

Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com> Sat, 28 August 2010 13:51 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: autoconf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9FD83A688B for <autoconf@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 28 Aug 2010 06:51:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.321
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.321 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.672, BAYES_50=0.001, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NFPJ76DlpO5D for <autoconf@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 28 Aug 2010 06:51:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp1-g21.free.fr (smtp1-g21.free.fr [212.27.42.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01E6D3A6862 for <autoconf@ietf.org>; Sat, 28 Aug 2010 06:51:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [82.239.213.32]) by smtp1-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ECB4940011 for <autoconf@ietf.org>; Sat, 28 Aug 2010 15:52:04 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4C79147F.5050005@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2010 15:51:59 +0200
From: Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; fr; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Thunderbird/3.1.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "autoconf@ietf.org" <autoconf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 100827-1, 27/08/2010), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Subject: [Autoconf] Could an AUTOCONF Router fail the Internet?
X-BeenThere: autoconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ad-Hoc Network Autoconfiguration WG discussion list <autoconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf>, <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/autoconf>
List-Post: <mailto:autoconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf>, <mailto:autoconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2010 13:51:40 -0000

Could an AUTOCONF Router fail the Internet?  How?

If yes, then it'd be good to have a requirement in the Charter to avoid
that situation.

Such could be to _localize_ the AUTOCONF mechanism to an "end-system",
more of a Host, or a hosty Node, rather than a Router.   Or, the term
"Router" is used throughout in the Charter.  Typically Router means an
entity whose failure would fail the Internet altogether.

Charter text deadline - August 30th, 2010.

Alex