Re: [Autoconf] Call for comments to a new AUTOCONF charter proposal.

[Alexandru Petrescu <[e-mail]>]

Le 30/06/2010 08:41, Zach Shelby a écrit :
>
> On Jun 30, 2010, at 1:22 AM, Jari Arkko wrote:
>
>> I do get that a solution with a central node (and perhaps any
>> solution with DHCP) does not solve all needs. Would you be happier
>> if the charter had four work items:
>>
>> 1. Design space survey (Informational) 2. The simple solution (such
>> as DHCP) (PS) 3. Limitations of the simple solution
>> (Informational) 4. Recharter for work on the more general solution
>
>
> +1. I support this approach. As Ryuji mentioned, we are almost
> finished with work in 6LoWPAN on optimizing ND so that it works in
> such a low-power and lossy network.

Well I need RA-based prefix exchanges and route updates not only on 
low-power and lossy networks.  I don't consider 6LoWPAN neither RoLL 
appropriate for RA-based prefix exchanges. (not to paint them in a 
corner but their applicability domain is not WiFi neither Mobile Router).

Alex

  There the approach is to enable
> autoconfiguration with either DHCP or using a multihop DAD technique.
> Autoconf might be able to extend or reference that work in item 2.
> above and consider both DHCP and ND as parts of a simple solution.
> For now I think it is enough to say in the charter that DHCP and ND
> mechanisms will be applied (with minimal extensions) for the simple
> solution.
>
> Zach
>