Re: [AVTCORE] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-vvc-08.txt

shuai zhao <shuai.zhao@ieee.org> Fri, 12 March 2021 04:39 UTC

Return-Path: <shuai.zhao@ieee.org>
X-Original-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D0AB3A164F for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 20:39:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.345
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.345 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.248, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ieee.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2rsY9w8lARwI for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 20:39:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pj1-x1031.google.com (mail-pj1-x1031.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1031]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FBC83A164C for <avt@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 20:39:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pj1-x1031.google.com with SMTP id lr1-20020a17090b4b81b02900ea0a3f38c1so2689627pjb.0 for <avt@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 20:39:55 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ieee.org; s=google; h=from:mime-version:subject:date:references:to:in-reply-to:message-id; bh=j02v4UtLF8BXapCkhKa/2GoXvPwQ22n72vohS5KOoGc=; b=dEXQr//H1eWv5xFaiMqCDztJX63HT5PBj9VQv829DcNfk+sX7srRv3yxi/JEUx5Ozp 54ZSZF5uPX6I6rmKRxtiIrfHBR72fRzP1PNe1yRoeNQB5tO9sW4A1VwbD2jxCD34wvjr vl2Zury1/oofGVQZCLoobjwLuh3Evs3XOGb2Q=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:subject:date:references:to :in-reply-to:message-id; bh=j02v4UtLF8BXapCkhKa/2GoXvPwQ22n72vohS5KOoGc=; b=KxIw5L5v3ZpUG9IAWlY2ObWg259kgjWA6CQ1OUaQ9sG/uB7aOAkZGzWhJvXFO5kNnh R/gUDAwpG+zd+qTSY+N6jl3A1Oki9IVnZKHd/8e5yiRufSuhwUQnEP8IrIm7PJ8ztc22 yDmT3uYKGysL0w9v9RVatrsdGGrfzefh7x3V5J7aYnR+CF9io9VR19ODj0JGAg9llk6V zfwIkGrOuUM7aK79TBLWwrwvHPSjUb3wZZlO7V+FXnp1RoJvJ8o3sJ3j2YnETS6jZmeS QZ2kRkuOGrkid+rrseIvxMYDF1k0AoUP7jKKbwx8qi5rWdp4k4RL0NvD653COCQwc1DS 6qdA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531HT3t+sHbp6n5Kye2ns5CBdtXFp2V3hJisdK/yqPP85Hngmxq/ vrKm0O62J/Fd63A02zogusPNPLWmN7gFiA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxwMxgKFQCrtfONrLgWTUkEI3tObagDmLrDdVNt5RlDrJ6CbE1AwHkKQwbPiJRFpE354qIMGw==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:ba8b:: with SMTP id t11mr12583622pjr.177.1615523993308; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 20:39:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:644:8200:46b0:1af:6596:47d1:6d77? ([2601:644:8200:46b0:1af:6596:47d1:6d77]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a7sm3790756pfo.105.2021.03.11.20.39.52 for <avt@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 11 Mar 2021 20:39:52 -0800 (PST)
From: shuai zhao <shuai.zhao@ieee.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_D2F04E71-DB9E-43D3-80F0-87A0FD4B2779"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.40.0.2.32\))
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 20:39:51 -0800
References: <161516601224.19878.4873068432407087649@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: avt@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <161516601224.19878.4873068432407087649@ietfa.amsl.com>
Message-Id: <D9C7DF8E-4F26-47C6-A606-7058D292ECB8@ieee.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.40.0.2.32)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/avt/-5IsHuEKKqrKxkkQrr3PAlb-fXY>
Subject: Re: [AVTCORE] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-vvc-08.txt
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/avt/>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 04:39:57 -0000

Hi All,



Here is the summary for -08, as we discussed during AVTCore session. Comments are welcomed.



- Editorial changes suggested by Ye-Kui in various locations

- removed the following editor’s note:

            - 1, framemarking is no longer supported in VVC payload, therefore removed.

            - 2, VVC draft is mature, nothing to update here, therefore removed

            - 3, there is no needed to describe DONL and sprop-max-don-diff, therefore removed.

            - 4, is not needed. Optional parameter list will be updated in editor-note 20,  therefore removed

            - 7, resolved note: decided not to support opi, therefore removed.

            - 8, 10, 12 13 removed based profile-id text update

            - 18, no long support max-lps, therefore removed

            - 22 and 23: no long support SLI and RPSI, therefore removed

- updated editor-note 20: with list of current supported optional parameters.

- removed informative note under ‘M’ bit

- make sure all informative notes have correct indentation.

- removed max-br, max-lps, max-cpb, max-dpb, max-tr, max-tc

            - updated max-lsr and max-fps subsections due to changes above

- proposed text for editor-note 24, the reserved “R” bit for FU header:

"There is an editor-note 24 for 'R’ in FU header (page 29). When set to 1, the R bit indicates the last NAL unit of a coded picture, i.e., the last byte of the FU payload is also the last byte of the coded picture.  When the FU payload is not the last fragment of a coded picture, the R bit MUST be set to 0."

- removed framemarking section 9 and reference

- removed SLI and RPSI

- current kramdown tool update should resolve the naming error automatically in the reference section.



Best,

Shuai


> On Mar 7, 2021, at 5:13 PM, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
> 
> 
> A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-vvc-08.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Shuai Zhao and posted to the
> IETF repository.
> 
> Name:		draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-vvc
> Revision:	08
> Title:		RTP Payload Format for Versatile Video Coding (VVC)
> Document date:	2021-03-07
> Group:		avtcore
> Pages:		52
> URL:            https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-vvc-08.txt
> Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-vvc/
> Htmlized:       https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-vvc
> Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-vvc-08
> Diff:           https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-vvc-08
> 
> Abstract:
>   This memo describes an RTP payload format for the video coding
>   standard ITU-T Recommendation H.266 and ISO/IEC International
>   Standard 23090-3, both also known as Versatile Video Coding (VVC) and
>   developed by the Joint Video Experts Team (JVET).  The RTP payload
>   format allows for packetization of one or more Network Abstraction
>   Layer (NAL) units in each RTP packet payload as well as fragmentation
>   of a NAL unit into multiple RTP packets.  The payload format has wide
>   applicability in videoconferencing, Internet video streaming, and
>   high-bitrate entertainment-quality video, among other applications.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> 
> The IETF Secretariat
> 
>