Re: [AVTCORE] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3711 (4425)

[Magnus Westerlund <[e-mail]>]

Hi,

I think this errata is editorial rather than technical. This as the 
error is in the part not specified by this RFC, rather as you say 
RFC3550. I don't think it is likely to cause any interoperability issue, 
but it should be retain. Thus I propose that it is put into the

HOLD for Document update

Category. Please provide an further comments on this.

Cheers

Magnus Westerlund
(Chair)


Den 2015-07-22 kl. 21:16, skrev RFC Errata System:
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC3711,
> "The Secure Real-time Transport Protocol (SRTP)".
>
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=3711&eid=4425
>
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Ross Finlayson <[e-mail]>
>
> Section: 3.4
>
> Original Text
> -------------
>        0                   1                   2                   3
>        0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
>       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+<+
>       |V=2|P|    RC   |   PT=SR or RR   |             length          | |
>       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |
>
>
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>        0                   1                   2                   3
>        0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
>       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+<+
>       |V=2|P|    RC   |   PT=SR or RR |             length          | |
>       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |
>
>
> Notes
> -----
> The boundary between the "PT=SR or RR" and the "length" fields is wrong: The boundary is shown as being between bits 16 and 17; it should be between bits 15 and 16.  I.e., the "PT=SR or RR" field should be 8 bits long, not 9.
>
> This is just a minor bug, because the equivalent diagram in RFC 3550 (the normative reference for RTCP) is correct.  Nonetheless, this bug should probably be added to the errata for RFC 3711
>
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>
> --------------------------------------
> RFC3711 (draft-ietf-avt-srtp-09)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : The Secure Real-time Transport Protocol (SRTP)
> Publication Date    : March 2004
> Author(s)           : M. Baugher, D. McGrew, M. Naslund, E. Carrara, K. Norrman
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Audio/Video Transport
> Area                : Real-time Applications and Infrastructure
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
>
> _______________________________________________
> Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt
>


-- 

Magnus Westerlund

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Services, Media and Network features, Ericsson Research EAB/TXM
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ericsson AB                 | Phone  [phone]
Färögatan 6                 | Mobile [phone]
SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden | mailto: [e-mail]
----------------------------------------------------------------------