Re: [AVTCORE] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-avtcore-cc-feedback-message-08: (with COMMENT)

Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org> Mon, 02 November 2020 17:14 UTC

Return-Path: <csp@csperkins.org>
X-Original-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20FEC3A0B9C; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 09:14:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=csperkins.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PUcqB58SFV8R; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 09:14:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from haggis.mythic-beasts.com (haggis.mythic-beasts.com [IPv6:2a00:1098:0:86:1000:0:2:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7AD653A0D5A; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 09:14:03 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=csperkins.org; s=mythic-beasts-k1; h=To:Date:From:Subject; bh=Oorc2DBtp6FtOOALXr+b0ZxyOoCEgsJAJ7toxGdl1E4=; b=SADaN4kwf77bhYnwYUJ4z7PAFT yk693h1YUapEA5iJySM+D3865g4+QpPiHjo4HxA1DQaQwRd0KXBlesT/bw02OsWTGUXT/rgZz2KSH 0nPmYTwSCFeJopK0nykhoCvZqMpVjvIiOb5RVmzyP3eXrm2Lepy0Wn6xH4tXVpUSQMz+DOrtibIVc /fEBeS13PQWqKxVfIHSX/wOXCyf6sVImPoVjjeU4WwXWnUJb4/CxX4nsMK658x9lZEN34r6EFWBse w6wzKJ2kvRuIul8ZNZyrJ0KO80uqJmz9Tp+mt52qvi38A5Ci75iX2xjBLNL4ok4Y43nl3xl6B8ra7 VwcNNomQ==;
Received: from [81.187.2.149] (port=45286 helo=[192.168.0.67]) by haggis.mythic-beasts.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.3) (envelope-from <csp@csperkins.org>) id 1kZdP7-00018T-SR; Mon, 02 Nov 2020 17:14:02 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.17\))
From: Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org>
In-Reply-To: <160071091148.27407.6808559717074897016@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2020 17:14:00 +0000
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, avtcore-chairs@ietf.org, avt@ietf.org, draft-ietf-avtcore-cc-feedback-message@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F3B2D6EA-AB13-4CF5-8853-25AFF4C206EE@csperkins.org>
References: <160071091148.27407.6808559717074897016@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.17)
X-BlackCat-Spam-Score: 19
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/avt/-tV1Scrjk856SODzuL1ly32veP8>
Subject: Re: [AVTCORE] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-avtcore-cc-feedback-message-08: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/avt/>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2020 17:14:35 -0000

> On 21 Sep 2020, at 18:55, Martin Duke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Martin Duke has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-avtcore-cc-feedback-message-08: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-avtcore-cc-feedback-message/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> It sounds like Colin is addressing the tsvart review, so thanks.

Yes, I’ll do this.

> In section 5, can you clarify (or provide a reference) how to detect RTCP
> packet loss? Is this simply a matter of receiving them at less than the
> configured rate?


There’s no sequence number in RTCP, so loss has to be inferred based on time since last feedback. 

-- 
Colin Perkins
https://csperkins.org/