[AVTCORE] I-D Action: draft-ietf-avt-srtp-not-mandatory-09.txt
internet-drafts@ietf.org Mon, 16 July 2012 15:16 UTC
Return-Path: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 402B921F8672; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 08:16:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.528
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.528 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.071, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j7Tn+zisqgfd; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 08:16:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83EA121F8680; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 08:16:38 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.30p3
Message-ID: <20120716151638.1813.47649.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 08:16:38 -0700
Cc: avt@ietf.org
Subject: [AVTCORE] I-D Action: draft-ietf-avt-srtp-not-mandatory-09.txt
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/avt>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 15:16:40 -0000
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance Working Group of the IETF. Title : Why RTP Does Not Mandate a Single Security Mechanism Author(s) : Colin Perkins Magnus Westerlund Filename : draft-ietf-avt-srtp-not-mandatory-09.txt Pages : 9 Date : 2012-07-16 Abstract: This memo discusses the problem of securing real-time multimedia sessions, and explains why the Real-time Transport Protocol (RTP), and the associated RTP control protocol (RTCP), do not mandate a single media security mechanism. Guidelines for designers and reviewers of future RTP extensions are provided, to ensure that appropriate security mechanisms are mandated, and that any such mechanisms are specified in a manner that conforms with the RTP architecture. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-avt-srtp-not-mandatory There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-avt-srtp-not-mandatory-09 A diff from previous version is available at: http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-avt-srtp-not-mandatory-09 Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
- [AVTCORE] I-D Action: draft-ietf-avt-srtp-not-man… internet-drafts