RE: [AVT] Retransmission draft

"Jose Rey" <rey@panasonic.de> Wed, 03 September 2003 08:17 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id EAA13285 for <avt-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Sep 2003 04:17:52 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19uSp9-0007yF-QE for avt-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 03 Sep 2003 04:17:08 -0400
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id h838H7O2030602 for avt-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 3 Sep 2003 04:17:07 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19uSp3-0007wc-4q; Wed, 03 Sep 2003 04:17:01 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19uSo6-0007vM-6E for avt@optimus.ietf.org; Wed, 03 Sep 2003 04:16:02 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id EAA13159 for <avt@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Sep 2003 04:15:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19uSo1-0001ne-00 for avt@ietf.org; Wed, 03 Sep 2003 04:15:57 -0400
Received: from mail.pel.panasonic.de ([194.162.191.12]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19uSo0-0001nX-00 for avt@ietf.org; Wed, 03 Sep 2003 04:15:56 -0400
Received: from atrgreyj ([10.78.238.55]) by mail.pel.panasonic.de with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Wed, 3 Sep 2003 10:15:48 +0200
From: Jose Rey <rey@panasonic.de>
To: Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org>
Cc: avt@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [AVT] Retransmission draft
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2003 10:15:48 +0200
Message-ID: <NGBBJIBNJOKHDHFKEOMHEEHJFDAA.rey@panasonic.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600
In-Reply-To: <70F687C9-DD8B-11D7-880D-000A957FC5F2@csperkins.org>
Importance: Normal
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Sep 2003 08:15:48.0867 (UTC) FILETIME=[9514DD30:01C371F3]
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: avt-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: avt-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Working Group <avt.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Colin Perkins [mailto:csp@csperkins.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 11:22 PM
> To: Jose Rey
> Cc: avt@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [AVT] Retransmission draft
> 
> 
> 
> On Wednesday, Jul 30, 2003, at 14:12 Europe/London, Jose Rey wrote:
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Colin Perkins [mailto:csp@csperkins.org]
> >> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 3:25 PM
> >> To: Jose Rey
> >> Cc: avt@ietf.org
> >> Subject: Re: [AVT] Retransmission draft
> >>
> >>
> >> Jose,
> >>
> >> --> "Jose Rey" <rey@panasonic.de> writes:
> >>> for your information:
> >>>
> >>> Matsushita has sent an IPR disclosure to the IETF IPR website 
> >>> regarding
> >>> patent rights applicable to the 
> draft-ietf-rtp-retransmission-08.txt.
> >>>
> >>> More information can be found under http://www.ietf.org/ipr
> >>
> >> Is it possible for you to elaborate on which parts of the
> >> retransmission format are covered by the Matsushita IPR?
> >
> > The disclosed IPR covers the fact that a packet has two sequence 
> > numbers, one of each is used to determine the transmission 
> order and 
> > the other one is for the reproduction order.  Applying this to the 
> > draft these two sequence numbers map to the "standard" RTP 
> SN and to 
> > the Original Sequence Number (OSN) fields, respectively.
> 
> This would imply that it's not possible to implement the 
> payload format 
> without infringing on the IPR?

Exactly, it is not possible to implement the 
payload format without infringing on the IPR.

cheers,

Jose
> 
> -- 
> Colin Perkins
> http://csperkins.org/
> 

_______________________________________________
Audio/Video Transport Working Group
avt@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt