Re: [AVTCORE] Review of draft-ietf-avtcore-6222bis

"Ali C. Begen (abegen)" <> Thu, 11 April 2013 07:55 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id B043321F8EC9 for <>; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 00:55:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.598
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U8OTt9gBZxGj for <>; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 00:55:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB6F921F8ECA for <>; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 00:55:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple;;; l=9453; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1365666923; x=1366876523; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=fPGyjhavas2wnAt1WpWJKng7bMB3hn6VG/jqWukvbLM=; b=Xl6TltSfH3sxEpoK+kRSLjdJKFDUxV/YEYIx9RJd+7YzW/llG8ZBKpgd iECx0kpIRxRiqD7gxuIOg+kTA6fdH2AyGuE3MilPLQGKOa5xXYsITXYiu aqTptXl53gRacwo+RhoOxgnU7k4JYa/jrpoxS2efD9UrjSMEzF/b9O2gp M=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.87,454,1363132800"; d="scan'208,217"; a="197489228"
Received: from ([]) by with ESMTP; 11 Apr 2013 07:55:23 +0000
Received: from ( []) by (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r3B7tNls027759 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 11 Apr 2013 07:55:23 GMT
Received: from ([fe80::747b:83e1:9755:d453]) by ([]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 02:55:22 -0500
From: "Ali C. Begen (abegen)" <>
To: "Brandenburg, R. (Ray) van" <>, "" <>
Thread-Topic: [AVTCORE] Review of draft-ietf-avtcore-6222bis
Thread-Index: Ac42iQ5wIiEH76hBRRKKB654zp+zdgAQ+qcA
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 07:54:00 +0000
Message-ID: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C15918F2FCDA0243A7C919DA7C4BE9940CFCE8D2xmbalnx01ciscoc_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "" <>
Subject: Re: [AVTCORE] Review of draft-ietf-avtcore-6222bis
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 07:55:24 -0000

From: <Brandenburg>, "R. van (Ray)" <<>>
Date: Thursday, April 11, 2013 10:49 AM
To: "<>" <<>>
Cc: "<>" <<>>
Subject: [AVTCORE] Review of draft-ietf-avtcore-6222bis

Hi all,

I’ve reviewed draft-ietf-avtcore-6222bis.


I’ve got two small comments/questions. I’ve not followed all discussion on this draft, so my comments might have been discussed earlier.

- Section 1 includes a reference to I-D.rescorla-avtcore-random-cname. What is the nature and intended status of this draft? Is it meant to be updated in the future (the latest version expired a couple of months ago)? If not, is it necessary to include it here for reference or can it be removed?

That draft will likely expire and not be published. That draft motivated the need for the bis document (the linkability of outputs resulting from the algorithms in 6222).

- Section 3 describes the deficiencies with the generation of CNAMEs in RFC3550, it does not describe the deficiencies in RFC6222 (while the problems with RFC6222 are hinted at in both the introduction and abstract). Is this intentional due to the fact that this draft obsoletes RFC6222 and that document can thus be considered informative for the purposes of this draft?


 Apart from these minor comments, I consider the draft to be ready for publication.


Best regards,


This e-mail and its contents are subject to the DISCLAIMER at