Re: [AVTCORE] Comments on draft-lennox-rtcweb-rtp-media-type-mux-00

Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> Fri, 11 November 2011 09:32 UTC

Return-Path: <harald@alvestrand.no>
X-Original-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0219221F8726 for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Nov 2011 01:32:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.543
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.543 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.056, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iISdEZPArAec for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Nov 2011 01:32:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no (eikenes.alvestrand.no [158.38.152.233]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C00EC21F86FF for <avt@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Nov 2011 01:32:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 184B739E12F; Fri, 11 Nov 2011 10:32:42 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eikenes.alvestrand.no
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3bjrmEXcAl03; Fri, 11 Nov 2011 10:32:37 +0100 (CET)
Received: from hta-dell.lul.corp.google.com (62-20-124-50.customer.telia.com [62.20.124.50]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3BF139E048; Fri, 11 Nov 2011 10:32:37 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <4EBCEBB5.2040403@alvestrand.no>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 10:32:37 +0100
From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.23) Gecko/20110921 Thunderbird/3.1.15
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
References: <4EB7B054.3000706@ericsson.com> <4EB7B4D8.5050003@alvestrand.no> <4EBBADD5.4020501@ericsson.com> <4EBBC481.5010504@alvestrand.no> <4EBBE238.20103@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <4EBBE238.20103@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Jonathan Lennox <jonathan@vidyo.com>, Jonathan Rosenberg <jonathan.rosenberg@skype.net>, IETF AVTCore WG <avt@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [AVTCORE] Comments on draft-lennox-rtcweb-rtp-media-type-mux-00
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/avt>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 09:32:47 -0000

On 11/10/2011 03:39 PM, Magnus Westerlund wrote:
>>
>> Still, I think we may be talking about CPU time per packet well below a
>> millisecond for the middle case.
>
> Yes, but if your goal for how many streams a single media range server 
> should handle is in the region of 100000 or more, then it does matter.

Hm. 100.000 streams of audio at 50 pps is 5 Mpps.
At average packet size 128 bytes, this is 640 Mbytes/sec, or 5 Gbits/sec.

You need 6 cores equivalent to Eric Rescorla's Macbook Air (which 
encrypts on the order of 100 MB/s, no hardware encryption support) to 
handle encryption of those streams.

Or two Altera AES cores 
(http://www.altera.com/products/ip/dsp/encryption_decryption/m-dcr-aes_enc.html).

Yes, it does matter. Somewhat.