[AVTCORE] AD review : draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-payload-registry

[Zaheduzzaman Sarker <[e-mail]>]

Hi,

Thanks for working on closing the unused registry where we even don't how
it was created.

I have an editorial suggestion. Then following text is well understandable
in the introducton section however, it is kind of not that well conducted
in abstract. I have following proposal

OLD:

To resolve this situation this document performs the following.
   First it updates the registry to include known RTP payload formats at
   the time of writing.  Then it closes the IANA Registry for RTP
   Payload formats Media Types for future registration.  Beyond
   instructing IANA to close this registry, the instructions to authors
   in RFC 8088 are updated to reflect this.


NEW:

This document resolves the situation by first updating the RTP Payload
Format Media Type registry to include all the known RTP payload
formats at
   the time of writing, then it closes this IANA Registry for any
future registration.  Beyond
   instructing IANA to close this registry, the instructions to authors
   in RFC 8088 are updated to reflect this.

If this is something that makes sense, then please update the draft and I
will directly start the IETF LC.

//Zahed