Re: [AVTCORE] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3611 (4597)
Alan Clark <alan.d.clark@telchemy.com> Tue, 05 April 2016 18:32 UTC
Return-Path: <alan.d.clark@telchemy.com>
X-Original-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B744012D60D for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 11:32:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4Qzj7JgoVLBR for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 11:32:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from omx.cbeyond.com (omx.cbeyond.com [50.20.30.29]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0515912D612 for <avt@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 11:32:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-SBRS: None
X-HAT: Sender Group GREYLIST_RELAY_PORT587, Policy $GREYLIST_RELAY applied.
X-Hostname: omx07bay.sys.cbeyond.net
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A2D3AQACBARX/8HTD0VEGoM3HjV9uSmCDwENgXIhhWwCgT84FAEBAQEBAQFlJ4RCAQEEMgEFQRALDQsJJQ8CRgYBDAYCAQGIIwUJLMAKAQEBAQEBAQMBAQEBARuKa4E4iF0BBIdvCocGiQKPcIRNgxyFPo8aHgEBQoIEDQyBaCAwAROIIwEBAQ
X-IPAS-Result: A2D3AQACBARX/8HTD0VEGoM3HjV9uSmCDwENgXIhhWwCgT84FAEBAQEBAQFlJ4RCAQEEMgEFQRALDQsJJQ8CRgYBDAYCAQGIIwUJLMAKAQEBAQEBAQMBAQEBARuKa4E4iF0BBIdvCocGiQKPcIRNgxyFPo8aHgEBQoIEDQyBaCAwAROIIwEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.24,445,1454994000"; d="scan'208";a="206221684"
Received: from unknown (HELO Alans-MBP.telchemy.com) ([69.15.211.193]) by omx.cbeyond.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA; 05 Apr 2016 14:32:57 -0400
To: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>, timur.friedman@lip6.fr, ben@nostrum.com, alissa@cooperw.in, keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com, roni.even@mail01.huawei.com
References: <20160122061024.2C4AA18046C@rfc-editor.org> <5702A356.1090900@ericsson.com>
From: Alan Clark <alan.d.clark@telchemy.com>
Message-ID: <570404D7.70407@telchemy.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2016 14:32:55 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <5702A356.1090900@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/avt/5Ae_cj7uuN1oSETjC-Bfvv40jm4>
Cc: avt@ietf.org, timebow@163.com
Subject: Re: [AVTCORE] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3611 (4597)
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/avt/>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2016 18:32:59 -0000
Hi Magnus As the author of that section of RFC 3611 I concur that the errata report is correct and the suggested change should be made. Regards Alan Clark On 4/4/16 1:24 PM, Magnus Westerlund wrote: > Hi, > > I have looked at this errata. It appears to be correct. I checked > Liu's calculation and get the same value. I think the reason the wrong > value is in the RFC is due that the authors calculated the 33% loss > value and used that to calculate the burst density, rather than 4/12s. > > As this can be confusing when implementing I propose that we verify > this Errata. > > Please provide any feedback on this proposal no later than the 18th of > April. > > Cheers > > Magnus Westerlund > > > Den 2016-01-22 kl. 03:10, skrev RFC Errata System: >> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC3611, >> "RTP Control Protocol Extended Reports (RTCP XR)". >> >> -------------------------------------- >> You may review the report below and at: >> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=3611&eid=4597 >> >> -------------------------------------- >> Type: Technical >> Reported by: Liu Yuanlong <timebow@163.com> >> >> Section: 4.7.2 >> >> Original Text >> ------------- >> burst density 84, which corresponds to 33% >> >> Corrected Text >> -------------- >> burst density 85, which corresponds to 33% >> >> Notes >> ----- >> error calculation for burst density, burst >> density=4/12*256=85.33...≈85 >> >> Instructions: >> ------------- >> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please >> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or >> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) >> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. >> >> -------------------------------------- >> RFC3611 (draft-ietf-avt-rtcp-report-extns-06) >> -------------------------------------- >> Title : RTP Control Protocol Extended Reports (RTCP XR) >> Publication Date : November 2003 >> Author(s) : T. Friedman, Ed., R. Caceres, Ed., A. Clark, Ed. >> Category : PROPOSED STANDARD >> Source : Audio/Video Transport >> Area : Real-time Applications and Infrastructure >> Stream : IETF >> Verifying Party : IESG >> >> > >
- [AVTCORE] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3611 (45… RFC Errata System
- Re: [AVTCORE] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3611… Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [AVTCORE] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3611… Alan Clark
- [AVTCORE] [Errata Verified] RFC3611 (4597) RFC Errata System