[AVTCORE] Protocol Action: 'RTP-mixer formatting of multiparty Real-time text' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-avtcore-multi-party-rtt-mix-20.txt)

The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> Wed, 26 May 2021 15:25 UTC

Return-Path: <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: avt@ietf.org
Delivered-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82F583A31F1; Wed, 26 May 2021 08:25:10 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.30.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, avt@ietf.org, avtcore-chairs@ietf.org, bernard.aboba@gmail.com, draft-ietf-avtcore-multi-party-rtt-mix@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, superuser@gmail.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <162204271050.27280.561200875302525148@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 08:25:10 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/avt/5ui7BEZ1ytfNgs8oZmhJaaz1lw0>
Subject: [AVTCORE] Protocol Action: 'RTP-mixer formatting of multiparty Real-time text' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-avtcore-multi-party-rtt-mix-20.txt)
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/avt/>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 15:25:11 -0000

The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'RTP-mixer formatting of multiparty Real-time text'
  (draft-ietf-avtcore-multi-party-rtt-mix-20.txt) as Proposed Standard

This document is the product of the Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance
Working Group.

The IESG contact persons are Murray Kucherawy and Francesca Palombini.

A URL of this Internet Draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-avtcore-multi-party-rtt-mix/




Technical Summary:

   Enhancements for RFC 4103 real-time text mixing are provided in this
   document, suitable for a centralized conference model that enables
   source identification and rapidly interleaved transmission of text
   from different sources.  The intended use is for real-time text
   mixers and participant endpoints capable of providing an efficient
   presentation or other treatment of a multi-party real-time text
   session.  The specified mechanism builds on the standard use of the
   CSRC list in the RTP packet for source identification.  The method
   makes use of the same "text/t140" and "text/red" formats as for two-
   party sessions.

   Solutions using multiple RTP streams in the same RTP session are
   briefly mentioned, as they could have some benefits over the RTP-
   mixer model.  The possibility to implement the solution in a wide
   range of existing RTP implementations made the RTP-mixer model be
   selected to be fully specified in this document.

   A capability exchange is specified so that it can be verified that a
   mixer and a participant can handle the multi-party coded real-time
   text stream using the RTP-mixer method.  The capability is indicated
   by use of an SDP media attribute "rtt-mixer".

   The document updates RFC 4103 "RTP Payload for Text Conversation".

   A specification of how a mixer can format text for the case when the
   endpoint is not multi-party aware is also provided.

Working Group Summary:

WG Last Call of "RTP-mixer formatting of multi-party Real-time text" was
announced on November 25, 2020:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/avt/tjGlWlXL5a54nhgl5nRV3jkD_tk/

WGLC concluded on December 9, 2020.

Of the 6 participants responding to the WGLC, 3 supported Advancement to
Proposed Standard, and 3 respondents provided comments, which were addressed
by the author. 

Document Quality:
There are no existing implementations of the specification.  

Personnel:

Document Shepherd is Bernard Aboba. Responsible AD is Murray Kucherawy.