Re: [AVTCORE] [Dart] Treatment of RTCP (was Re: Colin Perkins comments - WGLC: draft-ietf-dart-dscp-rtp-02)

Tom Taylor <tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com> Thu, 28 August 2014 19:31 UTC

Return-Path: <tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96AC21A8992 for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Aug 2014 12:31:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sHoWrNBvr4xD for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Aug 2014 12:30:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qa0-x22a.google.com (mail-qa0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB3281A896F for <avt@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Aug 2014 12:30:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qa0-f42.google.com with SMTP id i13so1196151qae.15 for <avt@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Aug 2014 12:30:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=swGWuB5+FYKRRtTYzcm3BS0IOLzyAzfNPDmN7KHn01g=; b=CTYRwPz8Sm0iqizdeuYYB1EnI7AYt2oUnE/jM3WXOkBf38JfR+R2PEqCEMqyIxNju/ UqS0IN/bbxKtaV7FfB+exn87CaL4NYtfBaaKlEeAXWc54JTFtwkg6uJwGGC/vm/GLNQT fNODNjrEFd8glu6yYzYqbKOlVGJPC3C1kFE3layNmd/h4A3eX1KkYPmeh2xnd4fCzi2N dDrNJNbVhBkNlrOGMoPkHCF9gL/IIXwR1JktY4jCrlOeLVOBVtDRRRxoo/XqvF+H1P94 RETN11FwA2zh7loyH+/dO+lj8IbpTUw4U6VA9O3SoW70SjAki3tR5LHY0SPZQ+9pV6SX dirw==
X-Received: by 10.140.27.173 with SMTP id 42mr9177037qgx.59.1409254253230; Thu, 28 Aug 2014 12:30:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.97.130] ([67.210.160.130]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id d62sm6918051qga.38.2014.08.28.12.30.52 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 28 Aug 2014 12:30:52 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <53FF836E.7080800@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 15:30:54 -0400
From: Tom Taylor <tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: avt@ietf.org, Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org>, Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no>
References: <embac59e09-6dad-42df-94b2-7daa46d31d5d@sydney> <704DAEE2-C26F-48C8-8C75-548FE115B91F@csperkins.org> <8D3D17ACE214DC429325B2B98F3AE712077BB42E1F@MX15A.corp.emc.com> <22E25F9C-E9B1-4C3C-989E-570BAAF58018@csperkins.org> <A4501649-B293-4B6F-A4EB-A08B30EF922C@ifi.uio.no> <C976F604-C51C-45A8-A207-A8416765CB83@csperkins.org> <9E8BAB84-3666-4692-8CF1-8FFE285DDF1B@csperkins.org>
In-Reply-To: <9E8BAB84-3666-4692-8CF1-8FFE285DDF1B@csperkins.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/avt/8SgR41Ii1m4GGZKuEaEG2GPL0yw
Subject: Re: [AVTCORE] [Dart] Treatment of RTCP (was Re: Colin Perkins comments - WGLC: draft-ietf-dart-dscp-rtp-02)
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/avt/>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 19:31:07 -0000

On 28/08/2014 2:02 PM, Colin Perkins wrote:
...

>
>>> I'd agree if I didn't have the impression, in RMCAT, that nothing but RTP / RTCP is allowed?!  So can we send extra packets to probe for the RTT?
>>
>> Yes, as I replied a couple of days ago.
>
> Wait, sorry, that was the email I replied to a couple of days ago reappearing… RTT probing, I guess :-)
>

Sorry, the new messages were released from non-member intercept a bit 
late. I can add Michael to the "always accept" list if he is likely to 
send a few more messages.

Tom Taylor