Re: [AVTCORE] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6184 (4714)

[Magnus Westerlund <[e-mail]>]

Hi,

This errata should be handled by the PAYLOAD WG. Please send any 
feedback to them rather than AVTCORE WG.

Cheers

Magnus

Den 2016-06-17 kl. 13:18, skrev RFC Errata System:
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6184,
> "RTP Payload Format for H.264 Video".
>
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6184&eid=4714
>
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Iñaki Baz Castillo <[e-mail]>
>
> Section: 8.2.2
>
> Original Text
> -------------
> To simplify the handling and matching of these configurations, the
> same RTP payload type number used in the offer SHOULD also be used
> in the answer, as specified in [8]
>
> [8] points to RFC 3264 "An Offer/Answer Model with the Session
> Description Protocol (SDP)"
>
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>
>
> Notes
> -----
> The above statement is wrong. RFC 3264 does not mandate the same payload
> type in both the offer and the answer. In fact, RFC 3264 section 5.1 states:
>
>    For sendonly RTP streams, the payload type
>    numbers indicate the value of the payload type field in RTP packets
>    the offerer is planning to send for that codec.  For sendrecv RTP
>    streams, the payload type numbers indicate the value of the payload
>    type field the offerer expects to receive, and would prefer to send.
>
>    However, for sendonly and sendrecv streams, the answer might indicate
>    different payload type numbers for the same codecs, in which case,
>    the offerer MUST send with the payload type numbers from the answer.
>
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>
> --------------------------------------
> RFC6184 (draft-ietf-avt-rtp-rfc3984bis-12)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : RTP Payload Format for H.264 Video
> Publication Date    : May 2011
> Author(s)           : Y.-K. Wang, R. Even, T. Kristensen, R. Jesup
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Audio/Video Transport
> Area                : Real-time Applications and Infrastructure
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt
>


-- 

Magnus Westerlund

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Services, Media and Network features, Ericsson Research EAB/TXM
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ericsson AB                 | Phone  [phone]
Färögatan 6                 | Mobile [phone]
SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden | mailto: [e-mail]
----------------------------------------------------------------------