[AVTCORE] Review of draft-ietf-avtcore-aria-srtp-00
Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Mon, 05 November 2012 18:17 UTC
Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D51821F8945 for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 10:17:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1a6d2tMJ7h1k for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 10:17:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ob0-f172.google.com (mail-ob0-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E144721F8912 for <avt@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 10:17:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ob0-f172.google.com with SMTP id v19so6469054obq.31 for <avt@ietf.org>; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 10:17:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=wHXouvNT2qv5Lnum0vs1Eianf2jGMhdfxlV9OOD5eNM=; b=liEjTDq/idgXEhfJINrFsLQlUtcn0x4a0a7q4iln4TYA2tWwu+0P7ryF6Hgh2OdYUC Rc/teXLo7TFbuYZIPCVVRcui9tAeseQqGC835NXZK5skvSDL7+QoIcSSGuKgmrjQ5agh 14Uyd/T0/XACBNgK4uyBxKMolQDwIoKZ43fekEoljQxxqH9l5jlb+7Q46U2wzpGh8LfN TPHzhBSumkLp63K0QTwUhzM65z4viRwoBrYD8gdKVqVv/Q25vh7xjHmBfLKtOo+pFMcj GINPGvpkD4FLlPkprL7EGnACnMoXJqyVKiuoLvn3ZaKiU2oC/c/tuBwp63FvIa4pnLYF wRaA==
Received: by 10.60.7.41 with SMTP id g9mr8383391oea.18.1352139462441; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 10:17:42 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.69.104 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 10:17:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Originating-IP: [2001:df8:0:16:5a55:caff:fef1:5a11]
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 13:17:02 -0500
Message-ID: <CABcZeBNWmUYaMZTo5BTN9_YJATNQERrsNpn_CF5Q4FegOwcYPw@mail.gmail.com>
To: avt@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkGekc4wmdao+F8I3D9kIVRk02TB8ARY547TDW9aEFie6s3m5cdY5WjxMsjNvTcoNdwKncm
Subject: [AVTCORE] Review of draft-ietf-avtcore-aria-srtp-00
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/avt>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 18:17:43 -0000
I have reviewed draft-ietf-avtcore-aria-srtp-00. I'm leaving aside the question of whether it's useful to define another symmetric encryption algorithm for SRTP (my view is generally no, especially since we have already specified SEED) but the WG seems to have decided that. With that said I don't really understand why you are defining three key sizes and three counter modes. I would recommend defining only 128 and 256-bit GCM unless there is some actual reason not to. Other than that, this seems like a reasonably plausible draft.
- [AVTCORE] Review of draft-ietf-avtcore-aria-srtp-… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [AVTCORE] Review of draft-ietf-avtcore-aria-s… Woo-Hwan Kim