IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [AVTCORE] Review of draft-ietf-avtcore-rfc5764-mux-fixes-02

Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu> Tue, 26 January 2016 23:27 UTC

Return-Path: <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 273171B333C for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 15:27:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.235
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.235 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LYVXCFtWuebi for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 15:27:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from resqmta-ch2-12v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-ch2-12v.sys.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe21:29:69:252:207:44]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ABAFB1B333B for <avt@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 15:27:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from resomta-ch2-13v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.109]) by resqmta-ch2-12v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id AnQA1s0012N9P4d01nTY0A; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 23:27:32 +0000
Received: from Paul-Kyzivats-MacBook-Pro.local ([73.218.51.154]) by resomta-ch2-13v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id AnTY1s0043KdFy101nTYkn; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 23:27:32 +0000
To: "Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)" <gsalguei@cisco.com>
References: <55894FE8.6080406@ericsson.com> <55FB1E25.7020702@acm.org> <55FC3935.6050605@alum.mit.edu> <560522EF.5000608@acm.org> <56055974.5060702@alum.mit.edu> <56A7D67A.10408@acm.org> <56A7E817.9020708@alum.mit.edu> <C5EA42B2-D6FD-4F71-94B4-AAC197DC5E11@cisco.com>
From: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
Message-ID: <56A800E3.6070901@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 18:27:31 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <C5EA42B2-D6FD-4F71-94B4-AAC197DC5E11@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20140121; t=1453850852; bh=wlZkjRoVtuGoz/zOXt+Pk745DrUU77BYOIHEjqRZZ0Q=; h=Received:Received:Subject:To:From:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=dPrvBa8cYMZRyADachk7vNTwq9cZ7RFgK7xJWpskAoxyGtp4pTmkP25tVdvE/Ctwx ek0MmTvSuixqbBRAm+wIkDXnGRFVGgyFs4DgnAgObQ1su7L7vfusjI/00JRWOilP3s 8Jj6NeH4dpmvJDfZPWNKtpo1flPke/HpyxWrU0hgvlVJCFe+jjGzE1vH9eDhmwDVbO 03DjG0DMPMZgDP8HByFdfEpe8KopIGpNWJ8VR0sp8wqgct/wLsLg+Eby7juxORJbX5 Mws+z2XfcLX9IRr2HFK3GenXjM8mjg8HvDO5cnKDcwWGBpdd+bidUMFb+6uM/+W7Q3 EWjLm6jH2odKQ==
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/avt/BQOy2Yqk_iDBbXpNPheju3xVVWE>
Cc: Marc Petit-Huguenin <petithug@acm.org>, "avt@ietf.org" <avt@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [AVTCORE] Review of draft-ietf-avtcore-rfc5764-mux-fixes-02
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/avt/>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 23:27:35 -0000

On 1/26/16 5:08 PM, Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei) wrote:
> Thanks for the review, Paul.  Posted an -05  addressing both your points.

OK. I'm satisfied!

	Thanks,
	Paul

> Cheers,
>
> Gonzalo
>
>
>> On Jan 26, 2016, at 1:41 PM, Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
>>
>> On 1/26/16 3:26 PM, Marc Petit-Huguenin wrote:
>>
>>> After more discussions between authors, we decided to remove the section about ordering altogether.  We now think that even if the proposal is not as future-proof as possible, it is good enough.
>>
>> This works better for me. Thanks!
>>
>> A few comments on -04:
>>
>> * Section 5 (Terminology):
>>
>> This is now section 5. That seems wrong. The document will read better if you make it section 2.
>>
>> * Section 6 (RFC5764 Updates):
>>
>> The new text still has some remnants of the ordering. In particular: "Then if ... Then if ... Then if ... Else if ...".
>>
>> I suggest changing this to "If ... If ... If ... If ...".
>>
>> Otherwise I'm happy.
>>
>> 	Thanks,
>> 	Paul
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance
>> avt@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt
>
>

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email