Re: [AVT] Retransmission draft

--> "Rolf Hakenberg" <hakenberg@panasonic.de> writes:
> Dear Gamze and all,
> 
> Although I believe that the concerns expressed in 3GPP on server
> complexity and delay are less relevant for our discussion on potential
> IPRs, please let me clarify the agreement in 3GPP.
> 
> At the last 3GPP SA4 meeting there was a consensus on to make RTP
> Retransmission a working assumption in PSS Rel-6, subject to the concerns
> on server complexity and delay being addressed at the next meeting.

Do you expect addressing these concerns to require changes to the draft?

> Important for our current discussion on potential IPRs and how to
> progress the draft is the fact that there was no condition on the IPR
> issues, but in fact conditions that the draft should move to RFC on
> standards track before the finalisation of 3GPP Rel-6.

Moving to the standards track requires resolution of the IPR issue within
AVT, of course.

-- 
Colin Perkins
http://csperkins.org/

_______________________________________________
Audio/Video Transport Working Group
avt@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt