Re: [AVTCORE] Mirja Kühlewind's Yes on draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-circuit-breakers-16: (with COMMENT)

"Ben Campbell" <ben@nostrum.com> Tue, 14 June 2016 08:44 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4749312D10C; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 01:44:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.326
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.326 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nyBbxdCJQPmo; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 01:44:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6405112D0EC; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 01:44:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.10.1.2] ([162.216.46.162]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id u5E8iEXW091403 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 14 Jun 2016 03:44:16 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [162.216.46.162] claimed to be [10.10.1.2]
From: "Ben Campbell" <ben@nostrum.com>
To: "Colin Perkins" <csp@csperkins.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 09:44:13 +0100
Message-ID: <51E76B10-EAB9-4B85-BE3C-ABDE7F2024E6@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <6368439E-52E1-479C-BF9C-AE32D0CC8BEF@csperkins.org>
References: <20160613221046.6815.11590.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <6368439E-52E1-479C-BF9C-AE32D0CC8BEF@csperkins.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.4r5234)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/avt/DwbW6cBDpwS6HBy9EHeChA-WB4M>
Cc: avtcore-chairs@ietf.org, Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>, draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-circuit-breakers@ietf.org, IETF AVTCore WG <avt@ietf.org>, Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [AVTCORE] =?utf-8?q?Mirja_K=C3=BChlewind=27s_Yes_on_draft-ietf-av?= =?utf-8?q?tcore-rtp-circuit-breakers-16=3A_=28with_COMMENT=29?=
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/avt/>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 08:44:32 -0000


On 14 Jun 2016, at 9:07, Colin Perkins wrote:

>> On 13 Jun 2016, at 23:10, Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net> 
>> wrote:
>>
>> Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
>> draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-circuit-breakers-16: Yes
>>
>> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
>> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut 
>> this
>> introductory paragraph, however.)
>>
>>
>> Please refer to 
>> https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
>> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>>
>>
>> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-circuit-breakers/
>>
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> COMMENT:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Thanks for address my discuss! Thanks for all the work and 
>> discussion!
>>
>> Final comment/question: Should reference 
>> [I-D.ietf-tsvwg-circuit-breaker]
>> should be normative?
>
> I think you can implement the RTP circuit breaker without reading the 
> TSV draft, so it should be informative, but I don’t much care either 
> way.

This is my impression as well.

Thanks!

Ben.