Re: [AVTCORE] WGLC on draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-multi-stream-optimisation-06 - my comments

"Roni Even" <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com> Mon, 28 September 2015 14:54 UTC

Return-Path: <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BF731A92FF for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Sep 2015 07:54:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jk1rk1ZykgpM for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Sep 2015 07:54:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x22b.google.com (mail-wi0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C76A71ABD3A for <avt@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Sep 2015 07:54:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wicge5 with SMTP id ge5so108886293wic.0 for <avt@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Sep 2015 07:54:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:thread-index :content-language; bh=VCT/1bGbIPznHgaaWeExXOxSNzU3f4JZE0JpKFGUGSM=; b=norj9ZOCSc2wONcN+ieGCHUdSKHFV0hZtPC0hfRZdZq/aUfXTtJd2d2jhe1CYvyGfu o/euAXcJlm9xgD9pOENW8ewML9PDfV1C1Q4XK9XF8VKpzV2BT1ZjOmhs/l45COHeTE+4 8h7PPqvpTw+FBMawapjlZGzK1Sxt6ceudb38fs9kBcM2Xl9SO/UADjOlq4I4XC9jllFJ HVGhqM1kb3J86EhXfENF694EHFcKzdaqSve3LBdq5IVhZxmzg1oHXb3wWAiNNDSenc9h aROTaUDTdDZqXZcWUvoEnGA6d1JIjUttBIdBek8imjN8NSVn/m58PBh6oqfw5itt/3Xw P+FA==
X-Received: by 10.180.81.199 with SMTP id c7mr18613214wiy.87.1443452075302; Mon, 28 Sep 2015 07:54:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from RoniPC (bzq-109-65-15-14.red.bezeqint.net. [109.65.15.14]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id jj8sm18742887wid.2.2015.09.28.07.54.33 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 28 Sep 2015 07:54:34 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Roni Even" <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
To: "'Colin Perkins'" <csp@csperkins.org>
References: <010801d0f7ae$88fbfc10$9af3f430$@gmail.com> <72523F90-D312-4048-B326-BE2901B37A09@csperkins.org>
In-Reply-To: <72523F90-D312-4048-B326-BE2901B37A09@csperkins.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 17:54:32 +0300
Message-ID: <019801d0f9fd$965e50f0$c31af2d0$@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQDLDIM3AwmWaflyVBA8kSUCIGLMcQFLjDhSoFOEESA=
Content-Language: he
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/avt/ENMJZZ6AS8jeTR7u78uiZLzt4kQ>
Cc: avt@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [AVTCORE] WGLC on draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-multi-stream-optimisation-06 - my comments
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/avt/>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 14:54:38 -0000

Hi,
Inline,
Roni

-----Original Message-----
From: Colin Perkins [mailto:csp@csperkins.org] 
Sent: Monday, September 28, 2015 4:52 PM
To: Roni Even
Cc: avt@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [AVTCORE] WGLC on draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-multi-stream-optimisation-06 - my comments

Hi,

> On 25 Sep 2015, at 17:23, Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> The document looks OK
> Some comments and nits
>  
> 1.       In section 1 “Consider a session  comprising ten participants, each sending three media streams with  their own SSRC.  There will be 30 SSRCs in such an RTP session, and
>    30 RTCP reception reports will be sent per reporting interval as each  SSRC reports on all the others.” Are there 30 RTCP reception reports or 270 if all 10 see all the session?  
> 

Each of the 30 SSRCs will send an RTCP Sender Report/Receiver Report packet. Each of those packets will contain several report blocks. I’ll try to clarify the text.

RE:  My understanding that without grouping as also in the example in section 4.1 each SSRC will send 27 RTCP SR/RR since it need to send to each SSRC he received from and he gets 27. Again this depends on the topology.

> 2.       Section 3.2.1 third paragraph “even if the some or” should be “even if some or”
> 
> 3.       In section 3.3 replace chose with choose

Will fix.

-- 
Colin Perkins
https://csperkins.org/