Re: [AVTCORE] Fwd: Technical - Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7273 (4450)

[Magnus Westerlund <[e-mail]>]

Ben,

Can you please update the Errata with the below original and edited 
text. This has been available on the list for quite some time so I 
suggest that you verify it after editing it.


Section 4.8:

Original Text
-------------
    ; PTP domain allowed characters: 0x21-0x7E (IEEE 1588-2002)
    ptp-domain-name = "domain-name=" 1*16ptp-domain-char
    ptp-domain-char = %x21-7E

    ; PTP domain allowed number range: 0-127 (IEEE 1588-2008)
    ptp-domain-nmbr = "domain-nmbr=" ptp-domain-dgts
    ptp-domain-dgts = ptp-domain-n1 / ptp-domain-n2 / ptp-domain-n3
    ptp-domain-n1   = DIGIT             ; 0-9
    ptp-domain-n2   = POS-DIGIT DIGIT   ; 10-99
    ptp-domain-n3   = ("10"/"11") DIGIT ; 100-119
                    / "12" %x30-37      ; 120-127

Corrected Text
--------------
    ; PTP domain allowed characters: 0x21-0x7E (IEEE 1588-2002)
    ptp-domain-name = 1*16ptp-domain-char
    ptp-domain-char = %x21-7E

    ; PTP domain allowed number range: 0-127 (IEEE 1588-2008)
    ptp-domain-nmbr = ptp-domain-dgts
    ptp-domain-dgts = ptp-domain-n1 / ptp-domain-n2 / ptp-domain-n3
    ptp-domain-n1   = DIGIT             ; 0-9
    ptp-domain-n2   = POS-DIGIT DIGIT   ; 10-99
    ptp-domain-n3   = ("10"/"11") DIGIT ; 100-119
                    / "12" %x30-37      ; 120-127





The Note should also be updated:

There is an inconsistency between ABNF in section 4.8 and examples in 
section 5.5. Due to evidence, that current implementations are working 
to what is shown in the examples, this is resolved by updating the ABNF 
specification.

cheers

Magnus


Den 2016-01-19 kl. 23:16, skrev Kevin Gross:
> The authors are in agreement that the most recent proposal is the
> desired fix and there doesn't seem to be any dissent in AVTCORE about
> it. Can we get the errata updated to reflect this most recent proposal?
> It is still showing my original report -
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7273
>
> Kevin Gross - AVA Networks
>
> On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 1:00 PM, Kevin Gross <[e-mail]
> <mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
>
>     The authors and I propose the following fix for the reported RFC
>     7273 errata. These ABNF changes bring the ABNF specification into
>     agreement with the examples in the RFC. Current RFC 7273
>     implementations have been based on the examples.
>
>     Original Text
>     -------------
>         ; PTP domain allowed characters: 0x21-0x7E (IEEE 1588-2002)
>         ptp-domain-name = "domain-name=" 1*16ptp-domain-char
>         ptp-domain-char = %x21-7E
>
>         ; PTP domain allowed number range: 0-127 (IEEE 1588-2008)
>         ptp-domain-nmbr = "domain-nmbr=" ptp-domain-dgts
>         ptp-domain-dgts = ptp-domain-n1 / ptp-domain-n2 / ptp-domain-n3
>         ptp-domain-n1   = DIGIT             ; 0-9
>         ptp-domain-n2   = POS-DIGIT DIGIT   ; 10-99
>         ptp-domain-n3   = ("10"/"11") DIGIT ; 100-119
>                         / "12" %x30-37      ; 120-127
>
>     Corrected Text
>     --------------
>         ; PTP domain allowed characters: 0x21-0x7E (IEEE 1588-2002)
>         ptp-domain-name = 1*16ptp-domain-char
>         ptp-domain-char = %x21-7E
>
>         ; PTP domain allowed number range: 0-127 (IEEE 1588-2008)
>         ptp-domain-nmbr = ptp-domain-dgts
>         ptp-domain-dgts = ptp-domain-n1 / ptp-domain-n2 / ptp-domain-n3
>         ptp-domain-n1   = DIGIT             ; 0-9
>         ptp-domain-n2   = POS-DIGIT DIGIT   ; 10-99
>         ptp-domain-n3   = ("10"/"11") DIGIT ; 100-119
>                         / "12" %x30-37      ; 120-127
>
>
>     Kevin Gross - AVA Networks
>
>     On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Kevin Gross <[e-mail]
>     <mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
>
>         Yes, I will take your discussion into account when proposing
>         final ABNF changes. I wanted first to make sure there were no
>         objection to the general proposal of fixing this by conforming
>         ABNF to examples. Since we have seen no objections, I will
>         proceed to prepare a revision.
>
>         Kevin Gross - AVA Networks
>
>         On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 3:33 AM, Magnus Westerlund
>         <[e-mail]
>         <mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
>
>             Hi Kevin,
>
>             Can you please review my previous email in detail:
>             https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/avt/kjoyUZh-9c4lYMM6pXQhH30TebY
>
>             I think you need to confirm on what changes that is really
>             proposed here, and thus my feedback is relevant for this.
>
>             However, I have so far seen no one objecting to the general
>             intention to at least make alignment with the examples?
>
>             Cheers
>
>             Magnus Westerlund
>             (AVTCORE chair)
>
>
>             --
>
>             Magnus Westerlund
>
>             ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>             Services, Media and Network features, Ericsson Research EAB/TXM
>             ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>             Ericsson AB                 | Phone [phone]
>             <tel:%2B46%2010%207148287>
>             Färögatan 6                 | Mobile [phone]
>             <tel:%2B46%2073%200949079>
>             SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden | mailto:
>             [e-mail]
>             <mailto:[e-mail]>
>             ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt
>


-- 

Magnus Westerlund

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Services, Media and Network features, Ericsson Research EAB/TXM
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ericsson AB                 | Phone  [phone]
Färögatan 6                 | Mobile [phone]
SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden | mailto: [e-mail]
----------------------------------------------------------------------