IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [AVTCORE] WG Last call on updates in draft-ietf-avtcore-rfc5285-bis-08

Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com> Tue, 07 March 2017 13:36 UTC

Return-Path: <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FFCA12947A for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 05:36:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.22
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.22 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H3OCb-TE6VDn for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 05:36:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sesbmg23.ericsson.net (sesbmg23.ericsson.net [193.180.251.37]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F7C9129460 for <avt@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 05:36:25 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb25-8a2a398000007fa8-20-58beb75770de
Received: from ESESSHC006.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.183.36]) by (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 7F.C5.32680.757BEB85; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 14:36:23 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (153.88.183.153) by smtp.internal.ericsson.com (153.88.183.38) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.319.2; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 14:35:53 +0100
To: IETF AVTCore WG <avt@ietf.org>
References: <5e4a567f-622f-ce0e-8715-1bf359726ed4@ericsson.com>
From: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
Message-ID: <edce260a-12c2-ecc3-2616-30f6b4dcf121@ericsson.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 14:35:51 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <5e4a567f-622f-ce0e-8715-1bf359726ed4@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFprDLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM2K7im749n0RBp23rC1e9qxkd2D0WLLk J1MAYxSXTUpqTmZZapG+XQJXxq0XVxgLugUr5k/dx9rA+JO3i5GDQ0LARGLzGcUuRi4OIYF1 jBK37k1lhHCWMUpc2fOZrYuRk0NYIFTi+rV7rCC2iICSxI5J25hBbCEBe4mbSxaBxdkELCRu /mgEq+cFij/6PxPMZhFQkdhy6g9YvahAjMTe/vtMEDWCEidnPmEBsTkFHCQu/r/FDHIQM1Dv g61lIGFmAXmJ5q2zoVZpSzQ0dbBOYOSfhaR7FkLHLCQdCxiZVzGKFqcWJ+WmGxnrpRZlJhcX 5+fp5aWWbGIEhtnBLb9VdzBefuN4iFGAg1GJh7egcm+EEGtiWXFl7iFGCQ5mJRHeBzlAId6U xMqq1KL8+KLSnNTiQ4zSHCxK4rxmK++HCwmkJ5akZqemFqQWwWSZODilGhjT3seey1/1RdTu +8tPczmnmFqGtgV3VNhu7Qp6GLA5Pe3FuaWXVvst13hXOmGxzTK/Ip0c4W3XUgJ+TZJf8eT/ zgU8Jbt81OovnJt15tzTJWbr/uQsUz25OW0Wb53d13976s55TrM4pCe0RDbi+K3r/zdLqkye rZdfOyH55J2kub1+0yc+ePnwvxJLcUaioRZzUXEiAIiTtaUvAgAA
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/avt/FZFgg5eRgUL8PEv5iD6wadfFIGk>
Subject: Re: [AVTCORE] WG Last call on updates in draft-ietf-avtcore-rfc5285-bis-08
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/avt/>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 13:36:49 -0000

Hi,

I will now request publication of rfc5285bis.

Cheers

Magnus

Den 2017-02-27 kl. 14:48, skrev Magnus Westerlund:
> WG,
>
> This starts a one week WG last call (until the 6th of March) on the
> changes that came as a result of the WG LC reviews. Thanks to Colin
> Perkins, Dale Worley and Paul Kyzivat that provided comments.
>
> My reading is that this version should address the issues raised, with
> one exception. What hasn't resulted in changes is Dale's request for
> additional guidelines on the choice of one or two byte header format
> when the new flag is not signalled. The discussion do indicates that it
> is difficult to draw clear conclusions in that case if one intendes to
> use 2-byte headers.
>
> I do request that you all review if it does address the issues and don't
> introduce additional issues.
>
> Diff between -05 (WG LC version) and current version at the start of
> this call:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-avtcore-rfc5285-bis-05&url2=draft-ietf-avtcore-rfc5285-bis-08
>
>
> Cheers
>
> Magnus Westerlund
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Services, Media and Network features, Ericsson Research EAB/TXM
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Ericsson AB                 | Phone  +46 10 7148287
> Färögatan 6                 | Mobile +46 73 0949079
> SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden | mailto: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance
> avt@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt
>


-- 

Magnus Westerlund

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Media Technologies, Ericsson Research
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ericsson AB                 | Phone  +46 10 7148287
Färögatan 6                 | Mobile +46 73 0949079
SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden | mailto: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email