Re: [AVTCORE] Review of RTP over QUIC (draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-over-quic-01)

Spencer Dawkins at IETF <> Thu, 15 December 2022 21:11 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49E2BC14792A for <>; Thu, 15 Dec 2022 13:11:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.094
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.094 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3gWvPMzXiBOn for <>; Thu, 15 Dec 2022 13:11:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::429]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9F91C147920 for <>; Thu, 15 Dec 2022 13:10:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: by with SMTP id c13so458662pfp.5 for <>; Thu, 15 Dec 2022 13:10:54 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=tEXuWOweZLrMoO12n7NQ0PUKOSCS72UY0YzSQp576NU=; b=TXXVKGPRFTNvf15SknEOMb8kABJPKnL3hF578pydU3jLUMBtdwQOGGIlWWxf11xFqv hAMYrcPMMmZwC33xPNwJh+WClrzUzsAlPePDvUoaQlWEspJT1lZs3GS5856WUzDyfL7I 9hTF2GUq7/8sYvuFAiPJ/lpDeqerqBXXKDxAnhkZ/p0pYvgnZbTLNIfQy/wGLJVqiL1E ubp+VZH9flOoyhHffp0xqgZpfVCHugIdUr6RGpTlz7nXpWVLGysFhcSDl8KGDQ/L65cI jc9MAbw5RKkx8u58gDTptnddKvdwKmj5BEe5LQZOOh7eDrhFXMuAr+qpvyYlVXuf+sf9 YJIg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=tEXuWOweZLrMoO12n7NQ0PUKOSCS72UY0YzSQp576NU=; b=oMo13xMjpZagAhmv9GWHmHsdZc113FNOS/qEnIXEfkWCCj4i7VMaQuGC/Ycc0rLelt lAVWn3zKpbebj6LtN55vryZdUZm4clJ+UAAShb8BddaqQ1Svf61qewKx5KULEbjqybaq YNxEVOAkbSuCSopHmlPLj/e5MHGbtd3ryS+WBxRJR2SpKqWkAY+E+A5xL7vuI6Zrej2m PrDhW40XbtPYBxl8Su/OI1llK0UeD34QlEH8Oi4wv8jl5I90kPvEZdK5yK/4V7NTw/up 1APQXvIN3XQNon3S7gwjPa1fru5eNlzdam8HUZ+AJ5EGWczfppHstRREGMLNl3eSB3bk Ki0Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pmm3ywhXWeEML5ddlJlAZ42NSlUQ2Bm2tf30blv2yGR2M+e11nk CbNBKa6HbCw0zOrHTpx79Nx5pe20U93CpsqIcFI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf4MeCUlOe+Y7lhglM5WYGwfZtg+DgPThj9gwyiBc/PKrru87doTVR6bSxRvQrtTWQRVf36oCXHr1whfIN+P1Js=
X-Received: by 2002:a63:120a:0:b0:478:1390:a12e with SMTP id h10-20020a63120a000000b004781390a12emr46878848pgl.174.1671138654038; Thu, 15 Dec 2022 13:10:54 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <> <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2022 15:10:27 -0600
Message-ID: <>
To: Vidhi Goel <>
Cc: Mathis Engelbart <>, Joerg Ott <>,
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d833ca05efe4491f"
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [AVTCORE] Review of RTP over QUIC (draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-over-quic-01)
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2022 21:11:41 -0000

Hi, Vidhi,

On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 2:10 PM Vidhi Goel <> wrote:

> Hi Spencer, Authors,
> I plan to create a PR for editorial + other things.

Bernard created
yesterday, which is a cut-and-paste of your review, so I think we're
synchronizing well.

Mathis and Joerg added me to the repo, but this is still a draft they have
responsibility for, so I should let you coordinate with them, and I'll do
my best not to step on anyone else's toes, or proposed changes.

And thank you for your help. I do feel that we might be breaking a logjam,
after today's virtual interim meeting.



> I would work on the congestion control section a bit and it’d be good if
> you could tell me what you think about using the word “rate adaptation”.
> Vidhi
> On Dec 15, 2022, at 7:43 AM, Spencer Dawkins at IETF <
>> wrote:
> Hi, Vidhi,
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 9:48 PM Vidhi Goel <vidhi_goel=
>> wrote:
>> Hello Authors,
>> I have read and reviewed draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-over-quic-01 and below
>> are my comments.
> This is super helpful, and your timing is excellent - I'm planning to talk
> about several of the topics you mention during the slot on scoping, during
> today's virtual interim meeting (meeting details are at
> ).
> Mathis, Jeorg, and I have also been entering issues in
>, beyond what I'm
> prepared to talk about today. For example, I don't have QUIC multipath on
> my slides, but we have it as
>> General comment - I think this draft will be really helpful for
>> developers of real time applications in migrating to QUIC (from UDP and
>> DTLS). The current draft touches on some important aspects such as
>> multiplexing, de-depulication of RTCP feedback fields etc. But it needs
>> some more details and clarifications regarding sections like
>> congestion control, connection migration, multi path capability.
> If you would like to send a PR for the editorial corrections you
> mentioned, that would be fine with me, and there are only three names in
> the ACKs section now, so I'm happy to add people as they send issues and
> text!
> Best,
> Spencer