Re: [AVT] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-avt-rfc3555bis-00.txt

Steve,

On 5 Aug 2005, at 09:54, Stephen Casner wrote:
...
>> - The question: would it make sense to split the rules for new MIME
>>   type registrations out into a separate draft from the updated
>>   registrations forms?
>
> I thought of that as I was preparing the revision.  However, I decided
> against it for a couple of reasons:
>
>   - The registrations should probably be updated to conform to the new
>     format requirements, so that means the whole document needs
>     updating.
>
>   - The text at the beginning makes a couple of forward references to
>     the registrations as examples.
>
>   - It's probably better to have the revised document obsolete 3555
>     rather than update it, and to do that the revision needs to
>     provide the equivalent content.

Okay, makes sense.

Colin

_______________________________________________
Audio/Video Transport Working Group
avt@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt