IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [AVTCORE] Mirja Kühlewind's Discuss on draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-circuit-breakers-15: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

"Ben Campbell" <ben@nostrum.com> Thu, 19 May 2016 01:54 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61D6812D677; Wed, 18 May 2016 18:54:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.326
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.326 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K4DfoTJTJbx0; Wed, 18 May 2016 18:54:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ABB0A12D5EE; Wed, 18 May 2016 18:54:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.18] (cpe-66-25-7-22.tx.res.rr.com [66.25.7.22]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id u4J1sIjX016178 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 18 May 2016 20:54:19 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host cpe-66-25-7-22.tx.res.rr.com [66.25.7.22] claimed to be [10.0.1.18]
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
To: Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>, Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org>, Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 20:54:21 -0500
Message-ID: <7756C174-2CC3-4300-B740-1AFD1C6BDBD2@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <624713E4-7BA0-48E4-8743-1103468F8176@kuehlewind.net>
References: <20160503120321.7534.26562.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <219AC00D-9E2E-4AF7-85F0-924EAE5F6164@kuehlewind.net> <BD5D6E34-3C35-4221-86A1-AB3150EBFFE1@csperkins.org> <8D786065-7DCD-43A2-BB69-5D7B1D44546B@kuehlewind.net> <953AB9F5-6220-4C9E-80B6-FE72BF80B648@csperkins.org> <762DC4EA-F5E8-49EB-BFEC-5DFA569B9444@kuehlewind.net> <12182E39-A26B-431F-9CCA-7E602EBFAB7E@csperkins.org> <30E6734A-0595-404E-8823-F27603B6CFC1@kuehlewind.net> <F3648EEF-5BBD-4F2F-BE9E-552D27EE3C2F@csperkins.org> <8CF47513-8E62-4EA0-B938-E9829EC4B774@kuehlewind.net> <9824AE79-0C56-4087-8C3C-E36812909B0E@csperkins.org> <1B501087-267A-4DBF-A08C-40245EC1200D@kuehlewind.net> <96261ECE-C99A-442F-BA22-7EF1CF200164@csperkins.org> <ED6AA3E6-0345-4D02-B76B-99CE822A5420@kuehlewind.net> <44A9243A-9429-45C4-A0EE-DBFD67A4148E@csperkins.org> <9F45AB9D-4AA1-46A1-9E00-1577EEBA6CE0@kuehlewind.net> <573C2FF9.7060400@ericsson.com> <F95E162D-AE57-47DA-9FF2-8BA8ECD1F4D7@kuehlewind.net> <573C51B2.7000503@ericsson.com> <624713E4-7BA0-48E4-8743-1103468F8176@kuehlewind.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.4r5234)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/avt/HTAZaa1ui3WL8Er5tPP7PIotAPo>
Cc: avtcore-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-circuit-breakers@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, avt@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [AVTCORE] Mirja Kühlewind's Discuss on draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-circuit-breakers-15: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/avt/>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 May 2016 01:54:28 -0000

On 18 May 2016, at 7:17, Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF) wrote:

> I think there might be a point of scheduling a call about how to 
> resolve this discuss.
>
>
> If none of the two solutions (or a third one that you come up with) is 
> acceptable for you, then a call would be good. Unfortunately, I’m 
> more than booked the next 1.5 weeks. I could maybe do tomorrow after 
> the telechat (whenever that is) or on Monday May 30…

As the shepherding AD, I strongly encourage a call. We really need to 
converge on this.

Unfortunately, I am booked for both of the times Mirja proposes (I have 
another call after the telechat, and May 30 is a US holiday.) But if 
others can make one of those times, please proceed without me.

Ben.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email