IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [AVTCORE] I-D Action: draft-ietf-payload-rtp-jpegxs-16.txt

Thomas Richter <thomas.richter@iis.fraunhofer.de> Wed, 16 June 2021 09:53 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=079450bc25=thomas.richter@iis.fraunhofer.de>
X-Original-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: avt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4604C3A0D97 for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 02:53:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id esOYNSy_jLZa for <avt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 02:53:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx-relay99-hz1.antispameurope.com (mx-relay99-hz1.antispameurope.com [94.100.132.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 879093A0D98 for <avt@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 02:53:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw1.iis.fraunhofer.de ([153.96.172.4]) by mx-relay99-hz1.antispameurope.com; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 11:53:45 +0200
Received: from mail.iis.fraunhofer.de (mail01.iis.fhg.de [153.96.171.211]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailgw1.iis.fraunhofer.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8E2C2400082; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 11:53:41 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.54.246.139] (153.96.171.210) by mail01.iis.fhg.de (2001:638:a0a:1111:fd91:8c2a:e4a5:e74e) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.18; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 11:53:41 +0200
To: avt@ietf.org, Tim Bruylants <TBR@intopix.com>
References: <162330812936.27802.12518960178457436082@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Thomas Richter <thomas.richter@iis.fraunhofer.de>
Message-ID: <81ea65be-13f4-3d33-bd58-60b88a98d283@iis.fraunhofer.de>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 11:53:40 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <162330812936.27802.12518960178457436082@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [153.96.171.210]
X-ClientProxiedBy: mail03.iis.fhg.de (2001:638:a0a:1111:314f:f22c:4a37:b25a) To mail01.iis.fhg.de (2001:638:a0a:1111:fd91:8c2a:e4a5:e74e)
X-cloud-security-sender: thomas.richter@iis.fraunhofer.de
X-cloud-security-recipient: avt@ietf.org
X-cloud-security-crypt: load encryption module
X-cloud-security-Virusscan: CLEAN
X-cloud-security-disclaimer: This E-Mail was scanned by E-Mailservice on mx-relay99-hz1.antispameurope.com with C0578A09801
X-cloud-security-connect: mailgw1.iis.fraunhofer.de[153.96.172.4], TLS=1, IP=153.96.172.4
X-cloud-security-Digest: 47379c6f83a57284c04077c6ca8aabb9
X-cloud-security: scantime:1.644
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/avt/HrGfocxpWWzRBuyKWystX-M8G50>
Subject: Re: [AVTCORE] I-D Action: draft-ietf-payload-rtp-jpegxs-16.txt
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/avt/>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 09:53:54 -0000

Dear members, Tim,
> 
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance WG of the IETF.

is it too late to ask for making the packetmode parameter mandatory 
instead of optional, thus implying a clarification of the SDP parameter?

Greetings,
	Thomas

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email